TOP

Frustrated CSCOPE Teacher!

Share Button

 

 

crying teacher

~~A very good teacher friend of mine needs prayer. She shared with me she is very frustrated about her job, and its going against her principles to be forced to teach CSCOPE.

She said I could share her story without using her name. CSCOPE does not only affect kids it affects teachers too!~~

 

“First day back at work after summer break. Our admin told us we would be using CSCOPE this year. We were urged to download the lesson plans because they will be gone Aug. 31, “because some people overreacted to the program” but were reassured that our curriculum person has backed up all lessons on her computer for us. GRRRRRR. I am so upset about this. It certainly doesn’t set a very good tone for the year. It’s very convicting to me to have to teach it. I am asking the Lord for an immediate answer. We will still be monitored by it which means if they come in and I’m not right where everyone else is, teaching what everyone else it at that moment in time, it’s a mark against me. I wish more people would wise up and speak up. We are a very faith centered community and NO one seems to know anything about CSCOPE.” How would you like to know our teacher feel this way about school administrators pushing this on them to teach?

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Proof That CSCOPE Is Not Needed

Share Button

thumb down

 

“Proof  That CSCOPE Is Not Needed: Valuable Links

by Donna Garner

8.20.13

 

Contents of this e-mail (short explanations of each): 

 

  • Information about CSCOPE lawsuit
  • Link to Alice Linahan Radio Show from 8.19.13 — discussion of CSCOPE and SBOE member, Thomas Ratliff
  • Discussion of Amicus Brief in support of CSCOPE filed by Texas Association of Community Schools (TACS)
  • How to view and understand Texas’ 2013 Accountability Ratings released on 8.9.13
  • Explanation of Indexes and Distinctions columns in 2013 Accountability Ratings spreadsheet
  • Chart showing TACS members’ school district 2013 ratings
  • How to find Spring 2013 STAAR/End-of-Course test results for every school campus/district in Texas

 

INFORMATION ABOUT CSCOPE LAWSUIT

 When the moms, pops, grandparents, and taxpayers of LLano, Texas, became very concerned about the content of the CSCOPE lessons being taught to their children and grandchildren in the LLano ISD, they filed a lawsuit to stop the CSCOPE lessons from being used until the Texas State Board of Education had finished its review (according to SB 1406 passed by the 83rd Legislative Session).

 

INVOLVEMENT BY TACS

 The Texas Association of Community Schools (TACS) is made up of members who have one high school in their district.  Members pay from $320 to $670 annually to belong and normally use taxpayers’ dollars to pay their dues and convention and conference expenses.

 The president of TACS is Mary Ann Whiteker, the superintendent of Hudson ISD.  Whiteker is to be a panelist in support of CSCOPE at the Sen. Dan Patrick vs. Thomas Ratliff CSCOPE debate this coming Saturday, Aug. 24, 6:30 P. M., at the U. of Tyler. 

 [Please take time to listen to this 8.19.13 podcast on the Alice Linahan Radio Show in which a group of moms discusses the threat their children face with CSCOPE and with Thomas Ratliff on the SBOE:  http://soundcloud.com/alice-linahan/women-on-the-wall-radio-show-1?utm_source=soundcloud&utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=twitter ]

 

 When the group of concerned citizens in LLano ISD filed their lawsuit, TACS almost immediately filed an Amicus Brief (link may need to be cut/copied/pasted into browser to work)  —https://docs.google.com/file/d/15ndWh4EmDih9aLBI_wQjgFt-0iuWqK_sGXB_E-r9TbxamGeEU87caEBzd3l9/edit  —  to defend the use of CSCOPE in their schools.  The brief has statements from various TACS superintendents who basically rave about CSCOPE and say their school districts could not possibly operate without this excellent CSCOPE system.  

 

The rave statements in favor of CSCOPE in the TACS’ Amicus Brief led me to do a little research.  Based upon the glowing statements from Lytle, Palacios, Abernathy, Hudson, Roosevelt, and Granger ISD’s in the Amicus Brief, I expected to see that their students had excelled on the 2013 Accountability Ratings released on 8.9.13 by the Texas Education Agency. 

 

After all, these TACS members that indicated they could not live without CSCOPE and had paid multiple-thousands of taxpayers’ dollars each year to purchase it must have had fabulous results on students’ STAAR/End-of-Course tests, right? 

 

Surely these TACS members could prove by the testing data that their students had mastered the Texas curriculum standards (TEKS).  The TEKS (English, Science, Social Studies, Math) have been adopted by the elected members of the Texas State Board of Education (SBOE) and are mandated for every public school in Texas. The TEKS tell educators WHAT to teach, but the educators at the local level decide HOW to teach it. By law, school administrators are required to make sure that the students in their districts are provided instruction that will prepare them for the STAAR/EOC’s.  

 

Let’s see how these TACS schools did?   

 

HOW TO VIEW AND UNDERSTAND THE 2013 ACCOUNTABILITY RATINGS

 

To see the various links on the TEA website to the 2013 Accountability Ratings, here is the link: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/index.html

 

The TEA used a massive spreadsheet to divide up every campus in Texas into groups of 40 so that comparisons can be made among campuses that have like-characteristics (e.g., enrollment, demographics, etc.).  To see the names of the Campus Comparison Groups, please go to this link and type in your search information: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/group.srch.html

 

 To see a composite screen of all of the campuses/districts in Texas along with their ratings, please go to this link:  http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/statelist.pdf

 

 

You will find seven columns out to the right of each campus/district name.  The first four columns are under the Indexes category.   If the campus/district meets the standard set for each column, there will be a “Y” in that column, meaning “Yes” the standard was met.”  If there is a blank, that means “No, the standard was not met.”   The first three Indexes apply to K-12, and the last Index applies only to high schools. 

 EXPLANATION OF INDEXES COLUMNS

 Index 1: Student Achievement. Provides a snapshot of performance across subjects, on

both general and alternative assessments (e.g., STAAR/End-of-Course tests), at the satisfactory performance standard.

 Index 2: Student Progress. Provides a measure of student progress by subject and

student group independent of overall student achievement levels [improvement over time or lack thereof].

 

 Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps. Emphasizes advanced academic achievement of

the economically disadvantaged student group and the lowest performing racial/ethnic

student groups at each campus or district.

 I

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness. Emphasizes the importance for students to receive

a high school diploma that provides them with the foundation necessary for success in

college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military. [This Index rates high schools on how well their students are prepared for post-secondary success.]

 

EXPLANATION OF DISTINCTIONS COLUMNS

 

I believe the three Distinctions columns are far more indicative of superior performance because they are based upon objective data that ratesacademic achievement (the primary goal of the public schools.)  The campuses/districts are only compared with their same like-characteristic group of 40.

 

The first column under Distinctions means outstanding academic achievement in English/Language Arts/Reading. 

 

The second column means outstanding academic achievement in Math. 

 

The third column means the campus/district was in the Top 25% of schools among the 40 like-comparison group of campuses.

 ================

 QUESTION:  How did those TACS schools that gave such rave reviews to CSCOPE in the Amicus Brief do academically?  According to those superintendents, CSCOPE is essential to the success of their districts; and they have spent multi-thousands of  taxpayers’ dollars to purchase it.  

 Please notice the chart below and all of the “NO’s” under Distinctions in the 2013 Accountability Ratings.  This should tell the public all they need to know about CSCOPE.  It obviously is not aligned with the TEKS. It obviously is not aligned with the STAAR/EOC tests. It obviously is not producing well-educated students. It obviously is an impediment to academic achievement. It obviously is a waste of taxpayers’ dollars.  

 

 

NAME OF CSCOPE DISTRICTS AND CAMPUSES DISTINCTION IN READING/ELA DISTINCTION IN MATH TOP 25%
       
ABERNATHY ISD NO NO NO
ABERNATHY HIGH SCHOOL YES YES YES
ABERNATHY JUNIOR HIGH YES YES YES
ABERNATHY ELEMENTARY YES NO NO
       
GRANGER ISD NO NO NO
GRANGER SCHOOL NO NO YES
       
*HUDSON ISD NO NO NO
HUDSON HIGH SCHOOL      
HUDSON MIDDLE SCHOOL YES YES YES
W. F. PEAVY PRIMARY NO NO NO
W. H. BONNER ELEMENTARY NO YES NO
       
       
LYTLE ISD (IMPROVEMENT REQUIRED) NO NO NO
LYTLE HIGH SCHOOL NO NO NO
LYTLE JR. HIGH SCHOOL NO NO NO
LYTLE ELEMENTARY NO NO YES
LYTLE PRIMARY NO NO NO
       
PALACIOS ISD NO NO NO
PALACIOS HIGH SCHOOL NO YES YES
PALACIOS JR. HIGH NO YES YES
CENTRAL ELEMENTARY YES NO NO
EAST SIDE INTERMEDIATE NO NO YES
       
ROOSEVELT ISD NO NO NO
ROOSEVELT HIGH SCHOOL NO YES NO
ROOSEVELT JR. HIGH YES NO YES
ROOSEVELT ELEMENTARY YES NO NO

 

*Hudson ISD’s superintendent is Mary Anne Whiteker, the president of TACS and an outspoken advocate for CSCOPE.  She is to be the pro-CSCOPE panelist at this Saturday’s debate between Sen. Dan Patrick and SBOE Member Thomas Ratliff.  Please notice how poorly her district did using CSCOPE.

 

=============

 

Explains the Accountability System 2013 —http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/account/2013/manual/ch02.pdf

 

Excerpts:

 

State Accountability Ratings

The overall design of the accountability rating system is a performance index framework.

Performance indicators are grouped into four indexes that align with the goals of the

accountability system.

 

The structure for evaluation of performance across the four indexes affords multiple views of campus and district performance. Performance across the four indexes are used to assign accountability rating labels based on performance targets that are set for each index.

 

Index 1: Student Achievement. Provides a snapshot of performance across subjects, on

both general and alternative assessments, at the satisfactory performance standard.

 

 

Index 2: Student Progress. Provides a measure of student progress by subject and

student group independent of overall student achievement levels.

 

 

Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps. Emphasizes advanced academic achievement of

the economically disadvantaged student group and the lowest performing racial/ethnic

student groups at each campus or district.

 

Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness. Emphasizes the importance for students to receive

a high school diploma that provides them with the foundation necessary for success in

college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military.

 

 

STAAR/END-OF-COURSE SPRING 2013 TEST RESULTS NOW AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC

 

The Spring 2013 STAAR/End-of-Course test results are now available for every campus/district in Texas and can be viewed by the public. 

 

Here is the link to the Statewide Spring 2013 STAAR/EOC scores:

 

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/student.assessment/staar/rpt/sum/yr13/  

 

 

To see individual campus and district STAAR/EOC scores for all Texas public schools, please go to the Pearson website: https://tx.pearsonaccess.com/tclp/portal/tclp.portal?_nfpb=true&_pageLabel=pa2_analytical_reporting_page

 

Notice the four radio buttons under “PDF Reports”  at the top of the page.  By clicking on the button, you can access STAAR/EOC results by State, Region, District, and/or Campus.  

 

 

Donna Garner

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

 

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Texas AG GREG ABBOTT FOR TEXAS GOVERNOR

Share Button

abbott

IMG_0720

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Microsoft, Thomas Ratliff, CSCOPE/PBL

Share Button

IMPEACH RATLIFF

Texas State Board of Education member, Thomas Ratliff is a paid lobbyist for Microsoft. Besides from the fact that is illegal to be a lobbyist and sit on the State Board of Education , Ratliff is promoting and supporting a radical change in Texas education called project based learning (PBL). The nations Common Core standards are based on PBL. Texas is one of 5 states that did not adopt common core, but that that did not stop the “education establishment” from implementing it. The Texas Education Service Centers,  Texas Association of School Administrators, Texas Association of School Boards, Texas School Superintendents and other education entities have been working at implementing PBL over the last 7 years under a veil of secrecy. Most smaller school districts use it under the name CSCOPE. Though the larger school districts have either created or purchased their own PBL curriculum.

The unveiling of CSCOPE has put Mr. Ratliff is some sorta tail spin. He has been publicly lashing out at taxpayers and citizens that are concerned about CSCOPE and the radical change in education. We have asked Mr. Ratliff he profits from Microsoft or the Public School System due to his lobbying and he has refused to answer. After some research it has been discovered that Microsoft promotes this radical change  of implementing PBL in the school system. Below you will find websites and photos of Microsoft’s support of Project Based Learning. 

Project Based Learning is being facilitated with the use of computers/IPAD’s for all students so they can be globally engaged. Microsoft sponsors Conferences and Summits Worldwide that have to do with Transforming education. The United Nations is behind this transformation. You can read about it here.

Microsoft-Implementing Project Based Learning in your classroom

microsoft 1

Microsoft Partners in Learning

microsoft

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

UNITED NATIONS, “COMMONCORE/CSCOPE/PROJECT BASED LEARNING” & TEXAS EDUCATION

Share Button

It took me almost a year of researching to find out why there was such a veil of secrecy surrounding CSCOPE. I  discovered it has been the implementation of a radical change in the way Texas students will be educated. This radical change is not new though it’s name changes with the times. Presently it is called “Project Based Learning”.  Project Based Learning is built around the collective and not individual achievement. American Sovereignty is not taught. Globalization and Diversity are promoted. The Texas Education Service Centers along with school Superintendents have worked deceptively in implementing this progressive philosophy in the school system since 2006. After much research the implementation of PBL can be traced back to the United Nations.

Texas schools through grant money and state funds have purchased millions of dollars of computers so students can be electronically engaged. Become more a part of the global society.

unesco twitter

 

IRINA BOKAVA, the Director General of  UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organizations, (UNESCO) was quoted as saying….

unesco

In 2011 Ms. Bokava at Effat University in Saudia Arabia for the Learning and Technology Conference. In her address she is quoted as saying…..

mindsets

Ms. Bokava is the  author of NEW HUMANISM FOR THE 21st CENTURY which promotes diversity, globalization all on the promise of world peace.

UNESCO along with international education bureaucracies goal is to Internet Communication Technology (ICT) coupled with Project Based Learning . That is why we are seeing Texas schools districts spending an enormous amount of money on IPAD’s and laptop for students.

Various publications…..

The Underutilization of Internet and Communication Technology-assisted Collaborative Project-Based Learning Among
International Educators: A Delphi Study

UNESCO ICT TRANSFORMING EDUCATION

 

 

arrow

 

Bringing PBL Washington

Below is the Alliance For Excellent Education. It is to no surpise that Humanist Linda Darling Hammond sits on the Board of Directors. CSCOPE also credits it’s teaching philosophy to Hammond.

manor

new tech

reimagine education

arrow

Bring PBL Home to TEXAS

huntsville ISD PBL

rockdale PBl

 

Name that project

 

 

kami

PBL COMPARISON

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Texas School Superintendents are Uneducated

Share Button

 

dumber

 

Texas Superintendents and the powers at be (TASA, TASB, TEA, Thomas Ratliff, etc.) have been working under a veil of secrecy in implementing a progressive/marxist philosophy of education in the Texas school system called “Project Based Learning” ( PBL). A majority of districts use it under the name of CSCOPE.  PBL is based on the collective and not individual achievement. Students work collaboratively to acquire their knowledge.  It is said that the teachers will no longer be a “SAGE ON THE STAGE”, with direct student teaching. They will now learn alongside the student, become a facilitator, mentor, and friend. It would appear a waste for teachers to spend thousands on an education to become just a facilitator in the class room. Presently with the use of CSCOPE teachers do not have to write their own lesson plans. They follow a script. Good veteran teachers are being weeded out and are quitting education because they are no longer allowed to truly TEACH.

When I speak with administrators as to why they are implementing “PBL” I am told the same “robotic” educanese lingo. PBL promotes critical thinking, 21st Learning skills, the use of higher order thinking and problem solving skills. If the truth be told this all comes down to Money and philosophy. The Federal Government and the United Nations is promoting this philosophy in order to create diversity and globalization.

Texas superintendents, administrators, and veteran teachers more than likely spent their school days in a traditional classroom setting. So would it be safe to say those that did are not well-educated compared to today’s standards? They were not afforded this “wonderful” opportunity to acquire their “higher order thinking and problem solving skills“. Parents need to question their local school administrator’s education and see what qualifies them to oversee their child’s education.

Do I truly think School Superintendents are stupid and educated? Not at all! As a matter of fact they have showed their intelligence and “higher order of thinking skills” when it came to deceptively implementing CSCOPE/PBL in the Texas Schools system since 2006 until someone  with more “critical thinking” ability exposed it.

 

Below are snap shots of various “project based learning” websites and their agenda of education.

 

pbl instructor

 What is PBL LinkFoundations

Link to article on Theoretical Foundations

Attributes

Attributes of PBL

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Are You Smarter Than a 1912 Eighth Grader?

Share Button

the free patriot

http://freepatriot.org/

Newly Discovered Eighth Grade Exam From 1912 Shows Just How Far Our Education System Has Fallen

1912 er

Share Button
Read More
TOP

CSCOPE to be taught at Llano ISD after court rules no jurisdiction

Share Button

Posted: Aug 16, 2013 6:40 PM CDT Updated: Aug 16, 2013 8:05 PM CDT

By Casey Claiborne – email

It was a sea of orange at the Burnet County Courthouse Annex on Friday and most were in favor of the “right to choose” but not how you might think. They support the right to choose what lesson plans they use in the classroom and the orange represents Llano ISD.

“My classroom from class to class, my curriculum might change and I’m not sure that a courtroom can look at my children and determine what’s good for them,” said Llano Spanish teacher Lisa Petty.

CSCOPE is a curriculum that has divided the state. Its detractors say it’s full of errors, it’s anti-American and anti-Christian.

Senator Dan Patrick drove 300 miles to testify but he didn’t get to. He has been fighting CSCOPE for a while, passing Senate Bill 1406, which essentially made CSCOPE subject to a heavy vetting process.

Patrick thought that was the end of CSCOPE. But since it’s now in the public domain, any school district can use it.

“Here’s my biggest frustration: I don’t understand why those who are defending it won’t at least acknowledge that there are problems with the program! And to say ‘look let’s get to the bottom of it!’ If we have these issues, let’s get to the bottom of it,” Patrick said.

So this summer, Llano ISD announced they would be using CSCOPE this school year. Some concerned taxpayers and parents decided to get together and sue the district.

At Friday’s hearing, the court decided it doesn’t have the jurisdiction to hear such a case.

“What that does with the lawsuit is, procedurally, it makes it go ‘bye, bye’ it goes ‘poof'” said plaintiff attorney Tim Cowart.

“I’m excited that my teachers have the tools that they want to use,” said Llano ISD superintendent Casey Callahan.

Cowart says his clients are considering taking an appeal to the Third Court of Appeals here in Austin.

In the meantime, Llano ISD will be using CSCOPE if teachers want to use it. They will not be required to use it.

Read more: http://www.myfoxaustin.com/story/23160277/cscope-to-be-taught-in-llano-isd-after-court-rules-no-jurisdiction#ixzz2cBxCFOG8

Share Button
Read More
TOP

WARNING: Texas Students Data Collected!

Share Button

Texas Schools now welcome students online activity during school hours, while at one time it was monitored and restricted. Why, you might ask? Besides from the fact they are steering away from a traditional to a more constructivist teaching philosophy of education, personal data is being collected on your child.

 

21st Century Workforce

One thing I have learned when the powers at be implement something that is sold to save you time or money or will be a benefit to you, it ultimately will remove more of your privacy or freedom.  This is being sold as a cost saver to your local school district and will help you when it comes to helping your child be college ready.  Seriously?  The Texas Education Agency along with Texas Education Service Centers and other agencies have been working on implementing a system called Texas Student Data System where your child will be traced from the time they enter the public school system (great reason to home school) until they finish college.  Give me a break! This is nothing more than the Government’s attempt at removing freedom and collecting data on families and limiting parental involvement. The state thinks they know better what is best for your child. 

Data Mining

Your local district has a PEIMS (Personal Education Information Management System) employee that works on collecting data and sending it to the appropriate WAREHOUSE. With federal funds the Texas Education Agency received through the American Recovery Reinvestment Act opened up for students data to be shared outside of the State and available to various researchers.

researchers

 

There are no boundaries as to what these organizations will do when it comes to our children. There is nothing sacred or private any longer when it comes to your family if you have entered the government public school system.

Each Texas Education Service Centers assist with the collecting data on students. They each have “Texas Student Data System employees” aka CHAMPIONS” that have your child’s best interest at heart. NOT!  You have seen this is not true with the Education Service Center’s deceptive plan of implementing CSCOPE in the Texas School System. CSCOPE assessment/test are mandatory within a district that has purchased it and students test results are recorded in a data system. These test never come home for parents to review.

 

Your child will receive a Unique ID number once they enter the “system”  that will stay with them along with he personal online StudentGPS dashboard with photo (see below).  Personal Information will be collected and coded. What will be collected? Name, Sex, Test Scores, Finances, activities, discipline, parents info, personality characteristics, psychological analysis, academic competency, etc. 

dashboards

 

 

 

 

 

ben Franklin

 

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEXAS PATRIOTS NEEDED IN BURNET TEXAS, Friday Aug. 16, 1:30pm

Share Button

Stop Common Core in Texas

Temporary Restraining Order Obtained Against Llano ISD
Join the Movement to – STOP CSCOPE!

Parents and Taxpayers

We Need All Hands on Deck

Now is the Time to SHOW UP 

@1:30 pm

District Courtroom of the Burnet County Annex in Burnet, Texas.
Courthouse Annex North
1701 E. Polk Street, Suite 90
Burnet, Texas 78611

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TECHNOLOGY: DANGER FOR TEXAS STUDENTS

Share Button

TECHNOLOGY

 

The danger imposed on our children has increased with the progressive agenda of having online learning for every student in every classroom. The powers at be want all students to have access to their individual laptops/ipads and even cell phones on a daily basis in their classes. Some school districts are even planing to equip their buses with wifi!

Millions of dollars of grant money have been funneled into and through the Texas Education System by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation to accomplish this progressive agenda.

What parents are not told is that personal information is being collected on their child and his or her family in the process and shared at the state and federal levels.

Johnny  Kissko is a Math teacher at Frenship High School in Wolfforth, Texas,(a CSCOPE district). Mr. Kissko is also a representative of “Microsoft Partner in Learning” and works on the side with his technology companies on behalf of Microsoft in implementing technology use in all classrooms.

Kissko led break out sessions during the 2011 CSCOPE conference titled “LINKING TWITTER TO CSCOPE”.

twitter to cscope

Mr. Kissko’s website K12 mobile learning, outlines what is happening with TEXAS schools through his various blog posts. During a 2010 Microsoft Confernce Kissko was interviewed by Cameron Evans, National and Chief Technology Officer, U.S. Education. Microsoft Corp. More on Mr. Evans Here.

 

Johnny’s twitter

 

I home schooled my children and monitored their online activities. From the time they were small we utilized educational as well as fun games they could play on the home computer. Moderation along with parental oversight was the key. The dangers exposed to students in public schools today has intensified with the push for all students to be online. 

 

THE DANGER

One scenario I became aware of in Texas School District, George West ISD was the twitter feed of 7th grade math teacher, Brenda Pawelek. Pawelek had a personal twitter feed and one for her class as well. On Pawelek’s class twitter feed she constantly tweets a young man in her class. I find this inappropriate for a teacher to have ongoing social contact with students in a personal online setting.

Pawelek is a sports nut and from the looks of her tweets one would think she grew up on an oil rig! The inappropriate material is over the top and is accessible to her students unless she has blocked them.

With all the technology that is being implemented, who oversees this kind of activity to insure our children are safe in the classroom?

CAUTION… INAPPROPRIATE MATERIAL

TODAY

brenda..

nasty

MS. PAWELEK’S CLASS TWITTER FEED.

Brenda 3

6-5-2013 7-08-17 PM

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TASA’s opinion of Thomas Jefferson “Only White Men Were Created Equal”?

Share Button

jefferson

by Calvin Russell

In a time when racial tension is unnecessarily raising it’s ugly head,why in the world would we want to attempt to open a wound that isn’t there in the first place.

Texas Association of School Administrator’s (TASA) exploration into Thomas Jefferson’s wording of the Declaration of Independence is appalling. To ask what Mr Jefferson’s meaning was when he used the words “ all men are created equal” knowing that slavery was going on at the time would seem an attempt to lead one to believe that Mr. Jefferson was either a hypocrite or a racist.

Five words, just five words to form an opinion of a man who pledged along with fifty-five other men “their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor” to commit to what England would call treason and many did indeed lose their lives, most lost their fortunes, but none that I am aware of ever lost their sacred honor. That is unless we allow TASA’s biased attempt at discrediting one of our most famous Founding Father’s reputation to convince our youth that he was in fact without honor.

In times like these when our nation needs to be reminded of the greatness of our country’s heritage and the sacrifice in blood and treasure that was paid in full to allow us a freedom that our generation has never fully known, we allow one more “educational organization” to spew their anti-American agenda at our kids. Heck, we even fund it with our tax dollars.

That’s right, lets just put a few kids together in a group that we call Project Based Learning and let them discover for themselves what Thomas Jefferson meant when he wrote these five simple words included in one of the most respected and cherished documents in American history.

And that’s the way we do it today. No teacher to guide and teach, just heat the pot and throw in some junk and whatever comes out in the end must be an education.

 

TASA’s new ITUNE Lesson

8-11-2013 10-24-50 PM

white

tasa itunes

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Restraining Order against Texas ISD on CSCOPE

Share Button

restraining-order-document

 

8.9.13 – 6:06 P. M. – BREAKING NEWS

 MEDIA ADVISORY”: CSCOPE Press Conference Monday, August 12th at 1:30 pm CT

Austin, Tx -Lt. Governor David Dewhurst and Llano ISD Parents, Grandparents and tax payers will hold a news conference on Monday, August  12 at 1:30 PM CT in the Senate Press Rm at the capitol in Austin, TXto announce that parents, grandparents and taxpayers of Llano County, Texas sought and obtained a Temporary Restraining Order from State District Judge Dan Mills. This Court Order bans the Llano Independent School District (Llano ISD) from the use of CSCOPE Lesson Plans until those plans have been approved by the State Board of Education.

During the news conference Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst and House Representative Steve Toth will stand with WomenOnTheWall.org Board Member Alice Linahan,  Llano Tax Payer Bill Hussey and Attorney Tim Cowart, who will make this announcement.

Details of the news conference:

When:                

Monday, August 12th at 1:30 PM CT

Where:              

Senate Press Room 

Capitol Building

Austin, TX

 http://www.voicesempower.com/media-advisory-cscope-press-conference-monday-august-12th-at-130-pm-ct/

 Donna Garner

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

 

PATRIOTS NEEDED in Austin on Monday. Let your

voices be heard and together we can  to put an end to

CSCOPE!

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Expert Says Cscope Science Lesson Faulty!

Share Button

8.9.13 — To parents, educators, administrators: 

 

From Donna Garner:  If you have doubts about the academic quality of CSCOPE lessons, the following 5th grade CSCOPE science lesson with comments by Janice VanCleave should validate your concerns.

Janice VanCleave is well-known internationally for her “Science for Every Kid” series and is an authority on making students’ science experiments fascinating while building them on sound science.  Her materials are used by science teachers all over the world: http://www.amazon.com/books/dp/0471503819

Janice VanCleave is a former secondary classroom teacher who has written more than 50 science and math books for kids and educators. Her reading audience spans ages from kindergarten to high school seniors. Janice’s books are translated in fifteen languages and to date there have been more than two million copies sold. So it is safe to say that kids and educators around the world are playing and having fun doing Janice VanCleave’s investigations.

Ms. VanCleave has taken the time to go through this 5th grade CSCOPE lesson and evaluate it for accuracy.  Here are her introductory comments and the link to view the CSCOPE lesson along with her reviews: 

 

From Janice VanCleave:  The following 5th grade lesson is the perfect example of why schools should not use CSCOPE. I actually got tired of correcting this lesson and stopped. I’ll review it more later, but there are enough errors marked to let any parent know that administrators/educators who choose CSCOPE for their district are setting their students up for failure on the state-mandated tests (i.e., STAAR tests).  

 

biology

 LINK TO 5TH GRADE CSCOPE LESSON:

 http://www.txcscopereview.com/2013/cscope-5-sci-phy-properties/

 

 

  

 

 

Donna Garner

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEXAS PUBLIC SERVANT CALLS GRASSROOTS EXTREMIST!!

Share Button
rat
Texas State Board of Education member Thomas Ratliff  does a great job in supplying blog material for those wanting to expose his liberal agenda. Ratliff sent the following email to Senator Dan Patrick and refers to the grassroot conservatives as “EXTREMIST”. If being a taxpayer/parent that loves Jesus and wants American Exceptionalism taught to Texas Students warrants the title of EXTREMIST, I will wear the title proudly.
 Thomas Ratliff is from the Ratliff clan that has and is still working to tear apart Texas Education. Daddy Ratliff, former Lt. Gov Bill Ratliff, has spent his career working to destroy education for all Texas students and Thomas fits his shoes well. His brother,Bennett Ratliff serves in the Texas House and guess what committee Bennett sits on? Yes the  “EDUCATION” committee. Who would have thunk it!
After I met with the Lt. Governor in January in regard to CSCOPE he promised me he would get with Senator Dan Patrick and have a hearing on CSCOPE. Since the hearing and all the negative publicity CSCOPE has received, Thomas Ratliff has gone off his rocker. Why? Does he profit from this?
Thomas is not a conservative nor is he a republican. He does not care about students in Texas. Thomas Ratliff cares about Thomas. Sad!
From: Thomas Ratliff <thomas@thomasratliff.com>
Date: August 7, 2013, 7:32:43 AM CDT
To: Thomas Ratliff <thomas@thomasratliff.com>
Cc: “dan.patrick@senate.state.tx.us” <dan.patrick@senate.state.tx.us>, Logan Spence
Subject: True Colors

Cyndi Lauper wrote a song called “True Colors” and it comes to mind when I watch Senator Patrick’s activities regarding CSCOPE.
First he films his “fireside chat” video talking about all of the right-wing issues he wants the Governor to add to the special session call.  It seemed like he spent a disproportionate amount of time on CSCOPE.
Now, according to the post below, he’s having a telephone call with a group of extremists to update them on CSCOPE.  It’s clear that Senator Patrick’s motives are political, not policy.  It’s hard to imagine how he has time to be a state senator and chair the Education Committee when he’s so busy campaigning.
I’m still waiting for you to keep your word Senator.  It’s time to have a POLICY debate on CSCOPE so everyone can see your true colors on this issue.  If you don’t want to have a “mano y mano” debate, simply have an interim hearing of your committee, that way you can sit at the big desk and I’ll sit down with the people you are trying to rule with an iron fist.
If you’re interested, here’s the link to tonight’s call with Senator Patrick.  If it doesn’t re-direct you, you may have to copy and paste it into your browser.
http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=5262f67741e3cd6da2cb29fb0&id=adcff06ab1&e=7bcd88ed97

———————-
T. Ratliff
State Board of Education, Vice Chairman
(903) 717-1190
right wind extremist
Share Button
Read More
TOP

The Perfect Plan To Destroy America – Nationalize Education

Share Button

reading_bible1

 

by Donna Garner 8.7.13

If a person wanted to destroy our American culture, keep this generation from communicating effectively with older generations, and make sure today’s children grow up detesting America instead of valuing our nation’s American exceptionalism, the best plan would be to implement the Common Core Standards (CCS) into every school in America.

OBAMA’S PLAN

That is exactly what Obama and his administration are trying to do, and 45 states (plus D. C.) originally committed to the CCS (before the standards had even been released publicly).  However, because of a groundswell of negative responses from the grassroots, a large number of states are now rethinking their commitment to the CCS.

TEACHERS REQUIRED TO DO…

As directed by the CCS, teachers have to make sure that by the time students graduate in 2014, 70% percent of books studied must be nonfiction (i.e., informational text); and those nonfiction selections must be taught in a “close reading” process.  That means students must not be given any background information or historical significance of a nonfiction piece before reading it.  For instance, the Declaration of Independence must be presented devoid of what was occurring in the United States at the time this monumental document was written, leaving students with a shallow understanding of the courage and revolutionary spirit that moved the signers to voice their opposition to tyranny.

Just as importantly, how many English teachers could possibly cover the great classic pieces of fiction literature in only 30% of classroom time?  None.  For instance, it takes at least four to six weeks in English I to cover Great Expectations, which is one of the most outstanding, applicable, and character-building books for early-high school teens to read.


THE DESTRUCTION OF FICTIONAL CLASSICS

As Dr. Sandra Stotsky recently explained about the CCS:

The reading standards for ELA are divided into 10 informational [nonfiction] standards and 9 literature [fiction] standards. That division goes from K to 12. It affects high school English as well as middle school English.  It means that over 50% of the reading instruction must be devoted to informational reading and less than 50% to poetry, drama, and fiction.http://whatiscommoncore.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dr-stotsky-sets-th…

Dr. Stotsky as quoted on the Heritage Foundation website:

This misplaced stress on informational texts (no matter how much is literary nonfiction) reflects the limited expertise of Common Core’s architects and sponsoring organizations in curriculum and in teachers’ training. This division of reading standards was clearly not developed or approved by English teachers and humanities scholars…

Common Core’s damage to the English curriculum is already taking shape. Anecdotal reports from high school English teachers indicate that the amount of informational or nonfiction reading they are being told to do in their classroom is 50 percent or more of their reading instructional time—and that they will have time only for excerpts from novels, plays, or epic poems if they want students to read more than very short stories and poems (12.11.12 –http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/12/questionable-quali… )

ARE THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS GOOD STANDARDS?

Even more basic, do the Common Core Standards teach children to read well at all?  No, the CCS do not.

In K-3, explicit and systematic instruction of decoding skills (phonics) is lacking; and goals for the independent mastery of these skills are not set nor expected.  In fact, not one of the CCS objectives on phonics and word analysis skills requires students to apply their decoding skills by reading independently and accurately unfamiliar words in and out of context. 

Nonfiction/informational text is weighted heavily at all grade levels K-12 while fiction is given short shrift.  Teachers and test makers are given no substantive standards as to how to select nonfiction/informational text and, thus, are not held accountable to select literary pieces of quality and significance.  In K-12, there are only two standards (Grades 11 and 12) that even mention American literature.

“Reading to understand” and “use information” are commonly used phrases K-12 in CCS; yet teachers are not required to teach students basic concepts such as topic sentences, paragraph development, introduction/conclusion of expository text, and chronological order.  Neither do the CCS contain a clear sequence of informational reading skills from grade level to grade level.

Rather than having students use appropriate dictionaries, the Common Core Standards expect students to learn vocabulary words in context (e.g., CCS.ELA-Literacy.L.7.5a – “interpret figures of speech…literary, Biblical, or mythological allusion”).  However, if students have not read the great literary, Biblical, or mythological pieces of the world, how can they possibly understand the vocabulary words in context?

In the area of composition (i.e., writing), the CCS do not teach elementary students to write persuasive papers (called “argument”) that are built upon informed sources but instead encourage students merely to share their opinions.

The oral and written language conventions (grammar/usage) in K-12 have no logical, cognitive progression from grade level to grade level but instead throw in confusing, stilted terminology at random such as Grade 4:  “Use modal auxiliaries to convey various conditions.”  What fourth grader (and probably his teacher) even knows what that means and much less how to produce it?

Many of the CCS standards are not measurable and contain artificially inflated wording and expectations such as “Analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature.”  As Dr. Sandra Stotsky stated about this standard, “How much and what kind of reading of world literature must precede the reading of a specific work that is to be analyzed for the author’s point of view?”

The Common Core Standards do not increase in depth and complexity from one grade level to the next.  Many of the standards are simply paraphrased or repeated frequently.  Particularly in the elementary grades where a child’s basic knowledge and skill foundation is put into place, there are not clear goals set that require students to demonstrate independent learning without having to be prompted constantly by the teacher.

Lack of ease with sounding out words automatically destroys a student’s reading pleasure and causes him/her to avoid reading the great classic pieces of the world.  The more the student refuses to read, the “dumber” she/he becomes. While other class members get “smarter” by reading more and better books, the slow readers fall further behind. This is called the Matthew Principle in the world of reading skills.

DESTROYING STUDENTS’ BIBLICAL AND LITERARY KNOWLEDGE

Of course, stripping away the teaching of the great classics of the world is the point because many are built upon Biblical principles.  If the Obama administration can limit children’s reading skills and destroy their appreciation and understanding of the Judeo-Christian ethic upon which America is built, then these children as adults will be much more susceptible to endorsing Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Islamism, Atheism, or whatever belief system will best destroy America’s God-ordained  place in the world.

 

Excerpts from E. D. Hirsch, Jr. in The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (2nd edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1993):

No one in the English-speaking world can be considered literate without a basic knowledge of the Bible… All educated speakers of American English need to understand what is meant when someone describes a contest as being between David and Goliath, or whether a person who has the ‘wisdom of Solomon’ is wise or foolish, or whether saying ‘My cup runneth over’ means the person feels fortunate or unfortunate.  Those who cannot understand such allusions cannot fully participate in literate English.

The Bible is also essential for understanding many of the moral and spiritual values of our culture, whatever our religious beliefs. The linguistic and cultural importance of the Bible is a fact that no one denies.

No person in the modern world can be considered educated without a basic knowledge of all the great religions of the world — Islam, Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity.  But our knowledge of Judaism and Christianity needs to be more detailed than that of other great religions, if only because of the historical accident that has embedded the Bible in our thought and language.

Probably the strongest reason to teach the Bible as literature is that almost all of the literature which scholars consider worthy of study was written by people who knew the Bible.  The Bible’s language, importance in society, and teachings permeate the majority of English works that are extant today.  Shakespeare’s education revolved around Bible study.  Try to find one of his plays that does not contain Biblical allusions.  Charles Dickens’ novels are replete with redemption allusions (e.g., ‘I am the Resurrection and the Life’ from A TALE OF TWO CITIES).

 

How will students be able to understand the writings of religious persecution if they do not know what the Bible says and how it was being interpreted by the various groups? 

 How can students understand the prejudice faced by Isaac the Jew in IVANHOE if they do not have a knowledge of Old and New Testament? 

 Students without Biblical knowledge will wonder why Gwenevere should be condemned to be burned for committing adultery against her husband King Arthur. 

 What would be so important about finding the Holy Grail if students did not know the crucifixion story?

 How will students feel the torment of Daniel DeFoe and of John Bunyan, whose wife’s dowry was her Bible which she used to teach John how to read?  (the end of excerpts taken from E. D. Hirsch, Jr., “The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy”) 

 

LITERARY ALLUSIONS: STUDENTS MUST UNDERSTAND THEM TO UNDERSTAND THE AMERICAN CULTURE

Following are various literary allusions that saturate our American culture on a daily basis.  Unless students read and study these great pieces of literature that have connected each succeeding generation with one another, how will today’s students be able to stay connected with their historical past and be able to appreciate our American way of life?

  •  The Journey — The journey sends a hero in search of some truth or information necessary to restore fertility to the kingdom such as is found in THE CANTERBURY TALES.
  • The Fall — This archetype describes a descent from a higher to a lower state of being.  The experience involves a defilement and/or loss of innocence and bliss as is found in Adam and Eve and PARADISE LOST.
  • The Quest — This motif describes the search for someone or some talisman which, when found and brought back, will restore fertility to a wasted land, the desolation of which is mirrored by a leader’s illness and disability such as in Galahad searching for the Holy Grail in IDYLLS OF THE KING.
  • Battle between Good and Evil — This is the battle between two primal forces such as between Satan and God in PARADISE LOST.
  • Heaven vs. Hell — This is the belief by man that parts of the universe are not accessible to man such as are found in the diabolic forces in PARADISE LOST, THE DIVINE COMEDY.
  • Supernatural Intervention — God intervenes on the side of man as found in THE BIBLE.
  • Fire vs. Ice — Fire represents knowledge, light, life, rebirth while ice represents ignorance, darkness, sterility, and death such as is found in Dante’s INFERNO.
  • The Hero — The life of the protagonist is clearly divided into a series of well-marked adventures which strongly suggest a ritualistic pattern.  The hero’s mother is a virgin, the circumstances of his conception are unusual, and at birth some attempt is made to kill him. These archetypes are seen in such Biblical characters as Joseph, Moses, Elijah, and Jesus Christ.
  •  The Devil Figure — The evil incarnate character who offers worldly goods, fame, or knowledge to the protagonist in exchange for possession of his soul is found in the Bible and is called Satan.
  •  The Woman Figure (The Platonic Ideal ) –   This woman is a source of inspiration and a spiritual ideal (e.g., the Virgin Mary).

Many important themes, concepts, and symbols are based upon Biblical literature:

The Trinity

The Cross

Temptation/Sin

Forgiveness/Redemption

Obedience/Punishment

Creation

God as a Power

Angels/Devils

Heaven/Hell

Twelve (tribes, apostles)

Self-sacrifice

Good/Evil

Forbidden Knowledge

Courage in the face of great danger

Value of Suffering

Prejudice (racial, political, and religious) Human Nature Faith in Human Nature Triumph from Adversity Poetic Justice

The following is a partial list of the Biblical references with which students must be familiar in order to be considered well-educated:

 

  • BEOWULF  — Grendel born of Cain, “God must decide who will be given to death’s cold grip,” hell, battle between good and evil

 

  • MORTE D’ARTHUR –Trinity, Sunday, Jesus, Holy Cross

 

  • THE CANTERBURY TALES — Pardoner contrasted to corrupted church, Christ’s gospel, forgiveness of sins, Holy Sacrament, Fiend, common enemy, perdition, story of Adam, Herod, John the Baptist

 

  • SIR GAWAIN — confession, penance

 

  • EVERYMAN — morality play, “I hanged between two, it cannot be denied”; “Thorns hurt my head.”

 

  • MACBETH — Golgatha, cherubim, Fallen Angel, common enemy of man

 

  • HOLY SONNET 10 — Donne — entire poem

 

  • HOLY SONNET 14 — Donne — “Batter my heart, three-personed God”

 

  • ON MY FIRST SON  — Jonson — “Child of my right hand”

 

  • PARADISE LOST — Milton — Adam, Eve, Heavenly Muse, Sinai,  Beelzebub, Seraphim, Tarsus, Leviathan

 

  • WHEN I CONSIDER HOW MY LIGHT IS SPENT — Milton — Parable of Talents (Matt. 25:14-30)

 

  • THE PILGRIM’S PROGRESS –  Bunyan — Vanity Fair, Celestial City, Beelzebub, Legion, temptation of Christ, Promised Land,  I Corinthians 5:10, Prince of Peace

 

  • THOUGHTS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY — Addison — “I consider the great day when we shall all of us be contemporaries and make our appearance together.”

 

  • THE RIME OF THE ANCIENT MARINER — Coleridge — forgiveness, penance, blessing, Wedding Guest, Bridegroom

 

  • JANE EYRE — Bronte — salvation; Helen Burns is a symbol of suffering, redemption (Christ-like figure); Mr. Rochester’s punishment, “valley of shadow of death,” remorse, repentance, reconcilement to his maker

 

  • CROSSING THE BAR — Tennyson — “I hope to see my Pilot face to face.”

 

  • PROSPICE — Browning — arch fear, fiend

 

  • RECESSIONAL — Kipling — Psalms 51:17, Romans 2:14

 

  • THE HOLLOW MEN — Eliot — “For thine is the kingdom”

 

  • THE ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN — Twain –  King Solomon, “pray  in the closet”

 

  • THE SCARLET LETTER — Hawthorne — Divine Maternity

 

  • A TALE OF TWO CITIES — Dickens — “Recalled to life,” sacrifice, redemption, Carton as the Christ-like figure (John 11:25), blood, forgiveness, power of love

 

  • LE’ MORTE D’ARTHUR — Pentecost

 

  • MORTE D’ARTHUR — Tennyson — “The light that led the holy Elders with the gift of myrrh.”

 

  • MERLIN — Muir — “The furrow drawn by Adam’s finger” — Genesis 1-5

 

  • WATERSHIP DOWN — Adams — The Creation, Noah’s Ark

 

  • OLD MAN AND THE SEA — Hemingway — Santiago (Christ-like figure), the mast, three days at sea

 

  • THE DEVIL AND TOM WALKER — Irving — Old Scratch, the Devil

 

  • THE GRAPES OF WRATH — Rose of Sharon, Exodus from Oklahoma, Noah’s Ark

 

  • THE SECOND COMING — Yeats — birth of Christ, Bethlehem

 

  • THE PEARL — Steinbeck — Hail Mary, tithe

 

  • HUSWIFERY — Taylor — God’s grace

 

  • THE FIRST SEVEN YEARS — Malamud — allusion to Genesis 29

 

  • THE BURNING OF OUR HOUSE — Bradstreet — Job 1:21, Ecclesiastes 1:2

 

  • SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD — Jonathan Edwards

 

  • THE MASQUE OF RED DEATH — Poe — “out-Heroded Herod,” a thief in the night

 

  • TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD — Lee –”take this cup from you,”  the parable of the good Samaritan, “Who is your neighbor?”

 

The following Spanish literature is taught as a part of the Advanced Placement curriculum and is filled with Biblical allusions:

 

· LA CELESTINA –Fernando de Rojas

 

· El CANTOR DE MÍO — epic poem of Spain

 

· DON QUIJOTE DE LA MANCHA — Miguel de Cervantes

 

· LAZARILLO DE TORMES — author unknown

 

· APOCALIPSIS –Marco Denevi

 

· EL EVANGELIO SEGÚN MARCOS — Jorge Luis Borges

 

· LOS DOS REYES Y LOS DOS LABERINTOS –  Jorge Luis Borges

 

· SONETO A CRISTO CRUCIFICADO — anonymous

 

· UNA CARTA A DIÓS — Gregorio Lopez y Fuentes

 

· LA LEYENDA DE SANTO DOMINGO DE LA CALZADA

 

· GENESIS — Marco Denevi

 

· SAN MANUEL BUENO, MÁRTIR — Miguel de Unamuno

CONCLUSION

Reading with ease and comprehension forms the cornerstone upon which success in all other school courses is based.  Reading the literary classics takes time but opens doors of opportunity and understanding for students.  The study of the Bible as literature is fundamental to a student’s education.  Biblical allusions exist in the classics as well as in modern literature.  Including the study of the Bible gives students a broader understanding of the major works that they will read in school and later in life.

Because the Common Core Standards diminish time spent on the great classic pieces of the world, many of which were written by authors “who cut their teeth” on the Bible, students who largely study informational text through the “close method” will lack an understanding of American exceptionalism.  We as Americans must not allow this to happen to our children and grandchildren who are the future of this great nation.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

CSCOPE CONFERENCE UNDERWAY IN SAN ANTONIO

Share Button

CSCOPEbanner

by Lou Ann Anderson

WatchDogWire

Akin to Mark Twain and his famous “report of my death was an exaggeration” quote, the same seems increasingly applicable to the alleged demise of CSCOPE, the controversial curriculum management system developed at taxpayer expense by Texas Regional Education Service Centers (ESCs) and used by approximately 875 public, private and charter schools. While CSCOPE’s lesson plans are theoretically scheduled to be unavailable after Aug. 31, the program appears alive and well – at least in consuming taxpayer dollars – as evidenced by a convention currently underway in San Antonio.

A recent article asked CSCOPE’s lesson plans: gone or gone into hiding?. The last State Board of Education meeting suggested the lesson plans were merely hiding – in fact, hiding in plain sight as they are now alleged to be in the public domain and, per Texas Education Agency attorney David Anderson, with “no statute” that would require districts to refrain from using CSCOPE.

With the Texas legislature now adjourned from its third special session, any legislative fixes anticipated prior to the school year start appear totally off the table. Meanwhile, in a Have No Fear CSCOPE Is Here? post, Red Hot Conservative alerted readers to the 2013 CSCOPE State Conference scheduled Aug. 6-8 at the San Antonio Convention Center.

The event’s 72-page agenda includes a welcome in which the “20 regional education service centers of Texas that comprise the Texas Curriculum Management Program Cooperative (TCMPC) are pleased to present this unique event filled with a wide variety of sessions and networking opportunities.”

The TCMPC board is staffed by ESC executive directors, all Texas public school employees, as was the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC), a governing board of the nonprofit corporation formed to oversee the CSCOPE curriculum management system. The board disbanded in the wake of CSCOPE’s controversy based on concerns over its formation without legislative authority and administrative operations that include a history of resisting to post or make public its meetings as per the Texas Open Meetings Act and efforts to withhold information requested through the Public Information Act, efforts that included using taxpayer-funded lawyers to argue it was a nonprofit.

As the San Antonio conference runs through Thursday, CSCOPE’s long-term fate remains unknown. Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst, Attorney General Greg Abbott and Sen. Dan Patrick have called for administrative audits and other new transparency with Republican gubernatorial candidate Tom Pauken echoing those concerns.

Meanwhile, since its 2005 inception and 2006 rollout into schools, CSCOPE has received new tax dollars for a program taxpayers paid to develop, for a curriculum that’s been a fight to see while generating financials so far withheld from all interested parties.

But one certainty: CSCOPE’s command of public dollars currently continues with Texas taxpayers footing the bill as thousands of Texas public school employees travel to San Antonio for this conference.

 

Lou Ann Anderson Lou Ann Anderson

Lou Ann Anderson is an information activist and the editor of Watchdog Wire – Texas. As a Policy Analyst with Americans for Prosperity – Texas, she writes and speaks about a variety of public policy topics. Lou Ann is the Creator and Online Producer at EstateofDenial.com, a web site that addresses the growing issue of probate abuse in which wills, trusts, guardianships and powers of attorney are used to loot assets from intended beneficiaries or heirs. Contact Lou Ann at Texas@WatchdogWire.com with story ideas and for ways to get involved with citizen journalism in Texas.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Huntsville ISD Throws Money Down Toilet

Share Button

money down toilet

HUNTSVILLE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT under the leadership of Dr. Steve Johnson dr. johnson.jpg along with the school board have spent an enormous amount of thousands money of taxpayers money. ON WHAT? To educate teachers to better instruct students in math, english, science or social studies? NO! It was teducate administrators(superintendents, principals, technology personnel) on how to radically change the way children are taught. It will no longer be about reading writing and arithmetic but RIGOR, RELEVANCE & RELATIONSHIP, stemming from implementing the progressive teaching/learning technique referred to as  Project Based Learning/CSCOPE.

School Transformation Network is working with Texas Association of School Administrators (TASA) to implement Creating a New Vision for Public Education in Texas, aka School Transformation: New Vision. Millions of taxpayer’s dollars are spent through our local school districts funding this radical progressive “TRANSFORMATION“. You can look below and see what Huntsville ISD spent just in the last two school years up to 2/13. Do not overlook their spending on

Please get involved in your local school districts and find out why they are funding this progressive ideology.

8-6-2013 11-57-01 AM

8-6-2013 11-58-54 AM

Huntsville ISD and every school district in the state is funding  TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS (TASA) and TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS (TASB) and their RADICAL PROGRESSIVE AGENDA with our TAX MONEY. This has got to  STOP!!! And it will when more and more people get involved and demand school districts be held accountable.  WHY ARE THEY USING OUR TAX MONEY TO FUND THESE TWO PROGRESSIVE/LIBERAL LOBBYING ASSOCIATIONS?

WAKE UP TEXANS!!

8-6-2013 11-54-38 AM

8-6-2013 11-54-38 AM

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Huntsville ISD Implementing CSCOPE for the 1st Time?

Share Button

Steven Johnson, Hunstville ISD school superintendent is grasping for straws in winning over his community’s approval of the progressive CSCOPE curriculum. He posted a letter in the HUNTSVILLE ITEM promoting the idea that HISD cannot possibly do without the wonderful “curriculum management system”, CSCOPE. Seriously! It makes you wonder how any of us were educated in the Texas Schools when CSCOPE did not exist. These administrators seem lost if they lose access to CSCOPE. Parents and Taxpayers need to realize is CSCOPE is all about implementing Project Based Learning. Project Based Learning is built around the collective and not individual achievement. Built on teaching Globalization and Diversity not American Exceptionalism. Tomorrow August 6, CSCOPE is starting their annual CSCOPE conference in San Antonio on the taxpayer dime.

 

 

One of the break out sessions is titled “Diversity in the Classroom? Have No Fear, CSCOPE IS HERE!”

no fear

CSCOPE PROGRAM/2013

In the comments section of the Huntsville Item article ESC 6, Component Director Dr. Cathy Moak responded to my comments. She stated that Huntsville ISD is in their first year of implementing CSCOPE. If that is the case why would Huntsville ISD spend 61,002.00 purchasing CSCOPE last school year, 2012/2013? Money doesn’t seem to be an object to HISD. They spend it like it grows on trees while at the same time joining forces with Texas Association of School Administrators and Texas Association of School Boards lobbying the Texas legislature for more money for schools. What is so sad is that this money doesn’t go back to the classroom to help students.

 

cathy moak

ms. moak

What Mrs. Moak doesn’t realize is there are teachers in Huntsville ISD that have been telling the truth of what is going on with HISD.

 Mrs. Moak who works for the Texas Education Service Center 6 which sells various services to Huntsville ISD. Mrs. Moak’s husband, Sam Moak serves on the HISD school board. If I read local government code 171.002 correctly Mr. Moak’s voting and discussion of items that relate to ESC 6 appears to be a conflict of interest.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Have No Fear CSCOPE Is Here?

Share Button
cscope fear
Did you know that CSCOPE is holding their 5th annual CSCOPE Conference starting tomorrow August 6 (in honor of my birthday, lol). Yes, that’s right more taxpayer money down the drain. Not only are school districts paying to send administrators/teachers to the conference, taxpayers are also funding their hotel and food bills as well.  It is astonishing that the same people (school administrators, TASA, TASB and legislatures) who are continually belly aching that there is shortage of money for education; think nothing of throwing it away on motivational conferences instead of bring the money back to the classroom.  What are they going to learn at this motivational conference? Read below.
I found the following post on Facebook yesterday by mom ~Kara Sands who is fighting CSCOPE along with hundreds cross the state of Texas.
______________________________________________________________________________________
Well, looky here… CSCOPE is having their annual conference next week in San Antonio. If you don’t mind your head exploding go ahead and read the descriptions for the different sessions that teachers and administrators will be attending… clearly Common Core inspired. —- Here’s my personal favorite- Diversity in Your Classroom? Have No Fear, CSCOPE is Here! (yep, that’s the real title) “With a combination of demonstrations and videos, participants will see how children can be transformed as they engage in learning activities.” Gee, I had no idea that “diversity” was in the TEKS. And what exactly do they mean by “transformed”?Folks, this is bad.

It’s not only the CSCOPE lessons that are troublesome, it’s the methods that our schools are using to teach our children and the philosophy behind it. One word kept popping into my mind as I was reading the descriptions, and that word is … collectivism.

My children, like yours, are unique, wonderful individuals with different talents and gifts. Like me, you probably celebrate their individuality and are raising them to be independent thinkers and self-sufficient. If so, how can we allow them to be taught the opposite at school? How can we allow our children to be lumped into a collective group where they learn to rely on the group for answers and the teacher is merely a “guide”? And how can these schools that continue to use CSCOPE do so when parents and lawmakers have overwhelmingly come out against it?

The superintendents & school board members that allow any part of CSCOPE into their schools should be ashamed of themselves. I encourage parents to run against these school board members and then once your elected you can fire the superintendent and the administrators. It’s time to clean house in Texas public schools.

I am not backing down and I will not stop until these liberal-progressive teaching methods are out of Texas schools — our children deserve better.

School districts are using taxpayer money to send various teachers and administrators to this conference. This money would be better utilized in the classroom. ~~~

 

 

 

 

*****Get involved and file Public Information Request on your local school districts and find out who all attended the conferences and what the district expenses are the conference, food and hotel.*********

Share Button
Read More