TOP

Parent says….Thank You CSCOPE!

Share Button
thank you
By Tony Mooney
Dear CScope,

Thank you.
Thank you for teaching my son fear.
Fear of failure.
Fear of testing.
Fear of his teachers and school.
Fear of society.
Fear of his peers and their impressions.
Fear to be himself.
And most of all, fear of learning.

Cscope, you have truly performed your task of differentiating kids to the point that they segregate themselves in the classroom as well as outside the classroom.
Kids no longer strive to achieve but instead strive to “get past the test”.
And yet, once the testing is done and they think they can breathe, they get loaded down with all the projects that couldn’t be done during the year due to all the assessments and teaching to the test.

Thank you for the sleepless nights due to stress.

Thank you for the tension headaches in an 11-year old child.

Thank you for the pervasive fear of failure and the belief that they are nothing if they don’t pass that test.

Thank you for the systematic destruction of self-confidence and happiness.

Thank you for the half-baked lessons and poorly worded questions.

Thank you for slowly killing the desire to learn new things.

Oh, and Cscope, I must tell you, because you are an inadequate learning tool created by idiots, foisted on us by buffoons and supported by cretins, I am being sarcastic, facetious and disengenuous. I apologize for using words your creators don’t understand but that’s what happens when you are taught to think and not regurgitate.

And tell your twin brother, TASB iCloud, you can put lipstick on a pig but…well, why finish it, when I doubt you understand.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEXAS PARENTS: Did your Child Fail Because of the STAAR Test?

Share Button

bumper-sticker-for-failing-staar-300x105

 

Students can be awarded certificates for being on the school honor roll all year and then told they failed because of grades on the state test called STAAR.

Some honor roll students are being required to attend summer school to take make-up classes in a subject they made an A or B on in class, but failed on the STAAR.  Since teachers do not know what a student missed on the STAAR test, they will be re-mediating students using the same materials used during the school year. Thus, honor roll students are being asked to learn material they already know.

Students that might pass a subject with a C in a subject also attend summer school if the fail that subject on the  STAAR test. As with honor roll students, teachers do not know what the student missed on the STAAR. It doesn’t matter, summer school is not designed to individual students. Instead, a set of prepared materials are taught in a short period of time.

If a student fails a subject in class as well as on the STAAR, the student goes to summer school and then passes to the next grade. Think about this. If a student doesn’t understand math and fails, how could this same student within the few days of summer school be taught all the math concepts presented during the school year and understand them?

After attending summer school, are students given the STAAR again?

I’ll be researching unanswered questions in this blog.

If your child failed because of the STAAR,  I suggest that you challenge the administration. After all, it is your child that is being labeled as a failure. Questions that you might want to ask are:

  • Of what value are the class grades if only STAAR grades are used for promotion?
  • If a student fails in his classes, but passes the STAAR tests, is that student promoted?
  • Do you think that with 100% accuracy, the STAAR tests access the abilities of every student?
  • Is it possible that some students understand the material, as shown by class work, but do not test well?
  • Since my child has passed his class work, do you think his teacher(s) have inflated his grades?
    If not, then his class grades reflect his understanding of the material presented. Why is he being failed if he his teacher has assessed his understanding during the entire school year and has given him a passing grade?

If CSCOPE was used, point out that the vendor selling CSCOPE lessons has chosen to delete these lessons and never sell them again. In exchange the CSCOPE lessons will not be reviewed by the State Board of Education and the results publicized. Since there is evidence that some of the CSCOPE lessons were plagarized, some have incorrect information, some have biased political content, etc…… Ask:

  • What evidence is there that using CSCOPE lessons has prepared my child for the STAAR?
  • Is it possible that my child has learned the incorrect content of the CSCOPE lessons, thus failed the STAAR?

While you are asking questions, find out what material is being used in summer school. Also, ask if the school plans to return to using textbooks. Ask if CSCOPE has been removed.

Parents, please don’t let school administrators try to bully you. Any administrator worth his salt will sit on the same side of the desk with you instead of behind the desk where he/she is in charge. This is a meeting to discuss your child and what is best for him/her. It is not a court case or shouldn’t be.

Some administrators make an effort to confuse parents with education terms not familiar to most parents, nor do they have to be. Terms such as, vertical alignment, instructional information documents, year at a glance schedules, alignment with the TEKS, etc…………………… If you do not understand what is being said, stop the speaker as ask for explanation. Know that just because you do not understand what I call “Educaneze,” which is educational buzz words, don’t think you would be considered stupid if you admit this. It is unprofessional for school administrators to do this, but too many want to be in control. Keep reminding yourself that it is your child that will be punished if you do not stand up to this person. Also, you could very well be the one who gives other parents the courage to do the same.

Do not go alone. Make sure you have someone with you. Before you leave, restate what you understand and ask for confirmation that it is correct. Either record the meeting, which is best, or take notes and ask the administrator to sign them. Do not think about this making the administrator angry. It shouldn’t if they are providing accurate information. Just keep reminding your self that you are standing in the gap for your child.

The hardest part or at least it is for me, is to not get angry. Take deep breaths to keep your self calm. Don’t let the administrator rush you. After all, your child is being failed and you want evidence to support this decision.

Please share your experience so other can benefit from it. One parent questioned his child being failed and the decision was reversed. The honor roll student does not have to repeat an entire year of social studies.

 

by Janice VanCleave

www.txcscopereview.com 

 

 

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

“The Story of Stuff” promoted by Texas A&M

Share Button

I spent thousands of dollars sending my daughter to Texas A&M, what I thought was a conservative Texas University. I am finding out every day that A&M it is not as conservative as I once imagined. For example, the Texas A&M Aggie T-STEM department is all about transforming our education system K-16 from conservative traditional based learning to a progressive project based learning. This is being done via grants and the program is called Texas A&M T-STEM Academy. The goals of T-STEM are outlined  HERE.

Texas A & M T-STEM Academy is working with other T-Stem Academies including,  the Texas Education Service Centers (created CSCOPE) and the Texas Education Agency to accomplish their progressive goal of implementing Project Based Learning (PBL).

On the Texas A&M’s T-STEM Website  you will find information describing the vision and intent of T-STEM. After evaluating CSCOPE lessons, I didn’t think I could be shocked by instruction material, but I was wrong.

Education is the one industry that is making money by making changes from traditional learning to Project Based Learning (PBL). You might be asking yourselves, “So What’s the Big Deal?” The answer is that while learning styles come and go, but PBL is not just a teaching technique. PBL is a progressive movement that promotes setting facts aside and allowing students to create their own understanding of the world around them. Even this is not what PBL is. Instead, while students are given freedom to make their own choices, the list of choices are manipulative. Students are being trained via PBL to embrace progressive, socialist ideology.

Parents, you cannot trust the state or federal education agency to know what your child should be taught. This is because these agencies are no longer focused on educating students in reading, writing, science, and math. Instead, they are focused on their social and emotional development. This is the job of parents, not public schools. There are grants providing millions of dollars to PBL learning, which is focused on your child’s social behavior and emotional development. Project Based Learning is the framework of the CSCOPE lessons as well as Common Core. In other words, Texas Schools who have been using CSCOPE already have the framework of Project Based Learning implemented. Thus, CSCOPE schools have the Common Core Project Based Learning in place. Its a small adjustment to replace the TEKS with the Common Core standards. 

Teachers are no longer given the option to avoid standards that are biased toward socialism or some specific religion. Whether its the CSCOPE Micromanaging System or something else administrators (with a need to be in control)  implement, the state standards, be they the TEKS or Common Core have become law. Since TEA and the State Education Service Centers promote Project Based Learning, it really doesn’t matter what the state standards are, its how they are implemented in student lessons. We have seen this with CSCOPE lessons promoting the Islamic religion to satisfy the  state standard to teach about different religions. Yes, the standards do matter. But how teachers implement them is so much more important. 

The following information is from the TEA’s website. This lets you know that TEA is supporting Project Based Learning.

funding

aggie stem 

I found the following powerpoint on T-STEM site. The following is a screen shot of one of the slides promoting the environmental leftist propoganda website “The Story of Stuff”   which is filled with numerous untruths in hopes in indoctrinating our children.

story of stuff

As Lou Dobbs states in the following news cast on CNN “The Story of Stuff” video has no place in our school system.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Texas Teacher Demonizes Christian Parents

Share Button

 teacher talk

 

We unfortunately live in a society today where a sense of decency often is  something that is not valued. What is even worse is that many of those individuals who devalue decency have the job of teaching and instilling unfavorable behavior traits in our children. Such is the case with one Texas Teacher.

This Texas Teacher has shared with her students through twitter that parents that teach that evolution is a “LIE” are hurting the nation and killing innovation”. George West ISD’s 7th grade math teacher Mrs. Pawelek has two twitter accounts. She has set up one for her students where she she post comments and photos of her students (has she informed the parents that she is taking photos of their children and posting them on the internet?) I found Ms. Pawelek’s Tweet below disturbing! The fact that she could be so bold and insensitive to students who believe in Intelligent Design, be they Christian, Jew or just Creationists of any stripe is concerning and offensive.

Mrs. Pawelek has also put herself in a position above her student’s parents in challenging their opinion when it disagrees with her own. How dare she spew her indoctrination and demonize the parents of the children in her classroom. I wonder how Mrs. Pawelek would respond if her own child was in my music or dance class or whatever and I had a twitter account for the class where I told my students that any parent who denied creationism must be pagan and is going to Hell. I am sure that she would remove her child from my class and give me a good cussing, which I would rightfully deserve. The sad difference is the fact that it is not nearly so easy to remove my child from her grasp and my tax dollars pay her salary either way.

      Her classroom twitter account.

Brenda 3

As a side note, why is it that the progressive liberals can’t or won’t allow competing ideas on evolution, education, etc.? The evolution “science” takes more faith than it takes to believe in Creationism or Intelligent Design.

Brenda Pawelek has another twitter account where she exercises no restraint on her foul language. Do you find it funny that both of the posts by her below start out with the premise of Deity? “OMG” doesn’t the G stand for God? And how about “Holy S..t”, OK maybe that is a stretch, but the point is that while our teachers have a right to their first ammendment right as much as the next person, in my opinion they should always remember that our kids are looking. I don’t personally know Mrs. Pawelek but maybe since she believes we came to being via evolution over time which, when partnered with the concept of no God, leads to a life of no moral absolutes which frees oneself to act anyway they choose with no right or wrong behavior other than their own opinion.

Surely we can do better than this when choosing educators for our most precious resource, our children.

brenda 1

brenda..

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

WARNING: PROJECT BASED LEARNING

Share Button

5-31-2013 11-25-53 PM

Teach children to think! You would think this is some new concept listening to liberal educators today.  I first heard this statement being championed by a CSCOPE Coordinator last year. After exercising my constitutional right to speak before the Willis ISD school board Oct/2012 regarding my concerns in relation to CSCOPE, ESC 6’s CSCOPE coordinator Lindy McColloch quickly tried to marginalize my concerns at this public forum  speaking after me. At the time I was unaware of Ms. McColloch’s presence in the room or who she was.

 

My Statements

Lindy McColloch comments

 

I found her anger and attitude concerning. Why would a state employee address a concerned citizen in this manner over a “curriculum”? After investigating CSCOPE and the behavior of those that support it, I and other critics soon realized there was a major problem. Not only were the lessons of poor quality and anti- american, teachers felt like they could not speak out and express their concerns out of fear of losing their jobs. Teachers felt controlled and intimidated by administration.  CSCOPE test did not match the material being taught. Students were failing, etc. Teachers began sending us emails thanking us for fighting for them.

The bigger picture started becoming apparent after more research. Texas Education Service Centers along with TASA and TASB and other organizations are in the works of implementing a Marxist based teaching philosophy called Project Based Learning (PBL). PBL is based on the Marxist Lev Vygotsky’s teaching philosophy.

With Project Based Learning (PBL) students create their own learning and build upon what they may already know. Students are not taught correct or factual information. Getting the correct answer is not important.  The learning process is built on group learning, based on the collective and not individual achievement.

I found this document from ESC 14 which will give you information and websites educating you what Project Based Learning (PBL) is.  I was reading the document and I behold I ran across that statement again, Teach children to think!

pbl

 

After is was announced that CSCOPE would drop their lessons I filed a public information requesting asking what ESC 6 sent to it’s local school districts addressing the issue. As you will read ESC’s continue to implement their progressive plan of Project Based Learning. Fortunately Parents and Grandparents are waking up to what the progressives are up to.

Here is the document that was sent.

Lindy Mc

 

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

CALL GOVERNOR PERRY NOW!!

Share Button

CALL PERRY

CALL PERRY’S OFFICE TODAY AND ASK HIM TO

VETO THE FOLLOWING BILLS.

Give me four years to teach the children and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted. ~ Lenin

Call the Governor’s office @
512-463-2000 or
AND
Email him at: HERE
VETO EACH ONE OF THESE BAD BILLS:
HB 2103
HB 5
HB 866
HB 2836
SB 2
HB 1675
HB 2824
HB 2103 – Allows the Texas Education Agency, the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the Texas Workforce Commission to share our children’s personal data with education research centers in Texas and across the nation  – the data goes back 20 years.
HB 5 – Exceptionally bad bill which must be stopped for the sake of our children. This bill will allow the Marxists to implement Type II teaching. It decimates the “measuring stick” (STAAR/EOC’s) so that parents will not know whether their children have been taught Type #1 or Type #2 curriculum (such as CSCOPE, Common Core Standards, Safari Montage, TASA iCLOUD) until it is too late
HB 866 – Companion to HB 5 to destroy the measuring stick – From Grades 3 – 8, students are only tested twice in Writing on an objective instrument (STAAR), once in Social Studies, two times in Science, three times in Math, and three times in Reading.
HB 2836 – Takes away authority over the curriculum standards (TEKS) from our elected Texas State Board of Education members. If passed this bill allow the Marxists to control what our children are taught.
SB 2 – Takes away authority over the charter school process from elected members of the Texas State Board of Education members – gives the authority to an unelected and appointed Commissioner of Education even though Michael Williams has not asked for that authority
HB 1675 – Delays Sunset Review of the Education Service Centers to Sept. 1, 2019. Very bad move. The ESCs must be put out of business. It is because of the ESCs that we have CSCOPE in our schools.
HB 2824 – Lets a consortium of so-called “high performing” (mostly mediocre) school districts off the hook in terms of testing and accountability, thus freeing them up to do teaching and learning to whatever goals (E.G. CSCOPE, I-CLOUD or Obama’s Common Core Standards) and standards they choose.
If you follow Rick Perry on Twitter or are a FB friend of his, post your message now!
For additional information contact
Bob Hall
(903) 896-1684
or
 “Alone you are but a drop of water. 
Together WE become a Tsunami!”
Share Button
Read More
TOP

Teacher Punished for Telling Students About Constitutional Right

Share Button

teacher

An Illinois high school teacher was punished by a local school district after he warned students about their Constitutional rights before answering a school-mandated survey about emotional and at-risk behavior.

John Dryden, a social studies teacher at Batavia High School, was issued a formal reprimand and docked a day’s pay. The punishment was doled out during a closed-door school board meeting.

The controversy started when the school district directed students to complete a survey about at-risk behavior – including past drug, tobacco and alcohol usage.

“I advised my students that they had a Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate themselves,” Dryden told a local newspaper. “It was not my intention for them not to take the survey.”

 

read more:

http://townhall.com/columnists/toddstarnes/2013/05/30/teacher-punis…

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEACHERS! SAVE CSCOPE LESSONS!!!

Share Button

 

Lacey Rainey

 

Superintendent of Curriculum/Instruction Community ISD

Lacey Rainey

 

 

Below you will find an email sent to Community ISD teachers asking them to save CSCOPE lessons. English teacher Stephanie Mohr, sent the email on behalf of the Superintendent for Curriculum and Instruction, Lacey Rainey. Rainey is known for supporting the Marxist/Progressive CSCOPE curriculum.

How liable will  Community ISD be if they continue ,to use the CSCOPE lessons after Aug 31? How about the students that may have failed the STAAR this year, is Community ISD and districts responsible for implementing an un-vetted program? If CSCOPE lessons are so rotten that TESCCC would remove the lessons, why would Rainey now want to save them?

CSCOPE… as you can see it is far from over. 

 

______________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

From: (Teacher Name Removed)
Date: Wed, May 29, 2013 at 11:58 AM
Subject: Need to do
To: TEACHERS (NAMES REMOVED)

 

Lacey has asked us to save the C-Scope lessons for her by grade level. The instructions are below. She wants this completed by next Friday 🙂 Let me know when you are done please.

The instructions for saving CScope lessons are as follows:

Sign out of your gmail
login to gmail with:
password:  cisdcurr
select Drive
Select CISD Curriculum Folder
Select your grade level
Select your subject
Upload your lessons
To save your lessons:
go to CSCOPE
select the exemplar lesson
select printer friendly version
a check box appears; everything needs to be checked
select print
open
save to h drive
Share Button
Read More
TOP

WARNING: PROJECT BASED LEARNING

Share Button

5-29-2013 12-48-29 PM

 

It became apparent to me that CSCOPE was part of a bigger problem and would lay a foundation for Project Based Learning (PBL). PBL is based on the teaching philosphy of Marxist Lev Vygotsky and Progressive educator John Dewey. The Texas Education Service Centers, Texas Association of School Administrators (TASA) and Texas Association of School Boards (TASB) are running full speed ahead to implement PBL  Parents and Taxpayers need to be very concerned about PBL. Here is a comparison between a Traditional Education and Project Based Learning,  The comparison is the same as traditional vs CSCOPE.

PBL COMPARISON

In reading the following statement copied from this webpage, makes you wonder why we have teachers go to school for years if the new goal is to have students teach themselves and teachers job is to become a facilitator.

5-29-2013 1-51-37 PM

 

May 9th, President Obama visited and praised Manor ISD’s New Tech High School which is has fully implemented Project Based Learning.  (His visit speaks volumes to those who value a traditional education).

 

manor isd

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Taxpayer Parasite CSCOPE Still Alive

Share Button

parasite

May 24, 2013 | BlogFeatured

Why is CSCOPE being given the time and room to plot it’s next move? CSCOPE has broken trust with Texas parents and taxpayers in every possible way.

Intrepid parents and taxpayers like Donna Garner, Janice Van Cleave, Women on the Wall, and Americans for Prosperity-Texas are finding out just how bad the picture really is. Let us review.agenda wise

CSCOPE got massive amounts of tax money to develop “time management” tools for teachers, even though a calendar and a pen still cost about $15 at Wal-Mart.

They were also tasked with creating a “professional development” tool to help teachers teach the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). This is the basic knowledge tested in the STAAR test.

What on Earth this “professional development tool” was ever supposed to be is anyone’s guess. The TEKS are the nuggets of knowledge kids need to know for the STAAR test, and they are on the Texas Education Agency (TEA) website.

As it turns out, CSCOPE pretty much just cut-and-pasted the TEKS off of the TEA website and called this their “professional development tool”.

At some point they also began developing curriculum – embarrassingly sub-standard curriculum that was also peppered with anti-Americanism and anti-Christianism. This aspect of CSCOPE has gotten most of the headlines, and rightly so, but it is just one part of what is wrong with both CSCOPE and the regional Education Service Centers (ESCs) that have perpetrated CSCOPE on Texans.

This curriculum is what CSOPE is no longer allowed to use, curriculum that included burka-wearing day for young Texas girls, communist flag-making day for school kids, and other such activities.

It is inconceivable that a group that would do such things would be allowed continued access to Texas classrooms by our elected officials, but that is what is happening right now.

CSCOPE tried to keep anyone from finding any of this out by making school districts sign non-disclosure agreements, binding them to not showing anyone the “tool”. This is very weird, and it turns out to be illegal. Parents have the legal right to see what their kids are being taught.

Since these “tools” were bought and paid for by the Texas taxpayer, we expected to be done paying for them.

Not so. CSCOPE is now renting their glorified calendar and cut-and-pasted TEKS to school districts. They also hold seminars to teach people how to use these masterpieces of learning technology.

If you think this sounds like a scam, it’s because it does.

Best of all, the TEA has these time management tools downloadable on its website. The TEKS are there too, which is what the “professional development” tool is.

This all means that CSCOPE is 100% obsolete.

What about it’s origins?

“CSCOPE”  is actually a product of a 501c3 non-profit corporation called TESCCC. The Board of TESCCC are the directors of these regional Education Service Centers (ESCs). The ESCs were given around $180 million in education grants to create these “tools”, and they contracted the work to TESCCC, who produced CSCOPE.

School districts are still paying rent for CSCOPE, and for absolutely no functional reason.

Some districts are pulling this continuing CSCOPE funding. Many are not.

Are parents and taxpayers powerless? No.

Parents and taxpayers can check to see if their ISD has pulled CSCOPE funding and use. If the Superintendant is protecting it, parents can organize to elect school board members who promise to hire a new Superintendant who will cut CSCOPE off.

When the CSCOPE controversy first hit, Sen. Patrick quickly emerged, saying he was pushing for more regulation of this obsolete, wasteful, anti-American, anti-Christian, and incompetent taxpayer leach.

“Regulate CSCOPE!” was not then a rallying cry that satisfied Texans. It still isn’t, despite Sen. Patrick’s recent press conference that failed to generate any sense of finality for the many Texas parents and taxpayers following this drama.

Instead of getting rid of this taxpayer parasite, the now-taskless-but-well-funded CSCOPE has been put under the State Board of Education’s purview.

The Attorney General is an elected official who has actually borne his teeth to CSCOPE, saying he will investigate them and kick them out of Texas if he finds illegality.

These days the executive branch is, hands-down, a better bet than the land-of-comically-low-expectations that is our legislative branch.

 

–AFP article “CSCOPE or C-SCAM?” (AFP has done excellent work on CSCOPE all session)

 

weston

Share Button
Read More
TOP

URGENT: CALL GOVERNOR PERRY

Share Button

GOVERNOR PERRY

URGENT CALL TO ACTION

 

Everyone fighting against CSCOPE in Texas schools needs to tell Gov. Perry to VETO HB 1675 or the Educational Service Centers – the people who sneaked CSCOPE into our schools by bypassing the SBOE-will NOT BE REVIEWED by the Sunset Committee in 2014 as scheduled. Instead they will get a reprieve until 2019. 

 

You MUST CALL ASAP or all our hard work may go right down the drain.

 

Twitter:  @GovernorPerry

 

Main Switchboard Governor’s Office: (512) 463-2000 (LIVE PERSON)

 

Opinion Hotline (512) 463-1782 – Open Tuesday at 8:00 am

 

 

 

Information: (800) 843-5789

 

All you need to do is give your name and where you live and simply say something like  “Please tell Gov. Perry to VETO House Bill 1675.” If you want to elaborate you can add a sentence or two abut WHY the Education Service Centers MUST be reviewed by the Sunset Commission NOW as scheduled.”

 

You may also email Gov Perry at:  http://governor.state.tx.us/contact/  – but phone calls are always best.

 

Colleen Vera

colleen@TexasTrashTalk.com

 

==========

5.27.13 – FROM PEGGY VENABLE, AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY

Americans for Propserity-Texas are calling on our activists to ask Governor Rick Perry to veto House Bill 1675.

We believe the Regional Education Service Centers (ESCs) should be reviewed on schedule so that their activities can finally be subjected to public oversight. The Regional Education Service Centers were originally set for Sunset Review in 2015 and that schedule should be maintained.

Click Here to Take Action!

Education reform has been an enormous issue this session and some of that has revolved around the controversial CSCOPE curriculum created by the ESCs.  The ESCs created a non-profit 501c3 shell corporation (TESCCC – the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative), which had no employees, address, phone number, or funding.  It appears the TESCCC filed no 990s. This shell corporation was used to shield ESCs from open meetings and open records. The lesson plans were provided with no opportunity for parental review, as is required by law.

While the ESCs have agreed to end the CSCOPE curriculum, they will continue CSCOPE management tools and other aspects, and perhaps even continue TESCCC. ESCs have betrayed the public trust and should be reviewed now, not in 2019.

We appreciate the leadership that the Governor has shown this session and trust that he will continue to demonstrate that common-sense leadership by vetoing H.B. 1675.

AFP-Texas fully supports the veto of HB 1675.

Please ask the Governor to veto HB 1675.

 

 Click Here to Take Action!

 

 

Donna Garner

wgarner1@hot.rr.com

Share Button
Read More
TOP

A Tribute to Soldiers and Their Families this Memorial Day/2013

Share Button

 

flag

 

May God Bless the mighty warriors and their families this Memorial Day, that have paid the ultimate price for all Americans that live in Freedom today.

This Memorial Day I want to personally Honor Navy Seal Chris Kyle for his service.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEACHER THANKS CSCOPE CRITICS

Share Button

teacher

 

TEACHERS HAVE LOST THEIR VOICE WHEN FIGHTING CSCOPE…. I RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING FROM A  CSCOPE TEACHER.

Thank you, thank you, thank you! I do not know what control this thing has over superintendents, but    it’s a scary thing! Prior to the hiring of our supt., we had district curriculum consultants who with teachers’ assistance, developed curriculum calendars for all subjects. Our ELA scores were amazing! And then the current supt rolls in. Cscope is the bible, Cscope is the National Archives, Cscope is everything a teacher needs….if you listen to the supt. Countless meetings have been held with the assistant supt. to share concerns but to no avail.
I have gone from a teacher having the confidence that I could accomplish anything in the classroom to a teacher that hasn’t known which end is up. Metaphors are our mantra…a ship without a rudder, a kite without a string, a compass without a needle.
How sad that education in our district wears the mask of deceit. I just wish that sanity could return to our classrooms.
Thank you so much for your continued work in exposing Cscope for what it is. Isn’t it interesting that this conflict has never been experienced over a textbook adoption?

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Texas Senators are Liars?

Share Button

LIARS

I don’t think I have personally witnessed such a group of arrogant and deceitful group of individuals as those in the Texas Education System. Despite the CSCOPE Senate hearings and the passage of Senate Bill 1406 which puts CSCOPE under the review of the SBOE not to mention the Texas Attorney General’s investigation of CSCOPE and it’s business practice; CSCOPE proponents are still touting the “WONDERS OF CSCOPE”. ESC Region 15 is now going to hold a mini conference and one of their break out sessions are to inform attendees how the TEXAS LEGISLATURE and CSCOPE CRITICS have manipulated material to suit our illicit purposes. So who do they truly think has preformed these illegal and unlawful activities? Is it the Senate, the House, the parents and outspoken critics such as myself.  Are we all just a bunch of liars? I wished they would publicize their idea of what illegal or lawless acts have been preformed!

Astonishing to me they would have the audacity to hold such a conference. How telling it is how bad they want to hold onto the progressive agenda behind it all. As I have told them all personally “I don’t know how they sleep at night”.

The following Handouts from ESC REGION 15 gives you the agenda for the Mini Conference where they will be addressing “The Truth About CSCOPE”.

mini conference

Being the director of ESC 15, Scot Goen obviously signed off and approved this conference and supports the agenda behind it. The state needs to quit funding these organizations NOW!! They are fighting state agencies, parents, etc to accomplish their liberal agenda of indoctrinating our children.

 Director: Scot Goen

I only hope Senator Patrick, Senator Campbell, Rep Toth and others see that these men and women behind CSCOPE are individuals that cannot be trusted with the education of our School Children. 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

GOODBYE BOYSCOUTS

Share Button

BOYSCOUTS

Not Just the Death of the Boy Scouts”

 

by Donna Garner

 5.25.13

 The Boy Scout Oath

 On my honor I will do my best
To do my duty to God and my country
and to obey the Scout Law;
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong,
mentally awake, and morally straight.

 

 The Boy Scout Law

 A Scout is:
Trustworthy, Loyal, Helpful,
Friendly, Courteous, Kind,
Obedient, Cheerful, Thrifty,
Brave, Clean, Reverent

 

 The 61% of the 1,400 Boy Scouts of America National Council delegates who voted to allow openly gay boys to join the Boy Scouts have sent a clear message to America: “The Boy Scout Oath is meaningless, and we leaders who are supposed to exemplify courage have caved to political pressure.”

 

 To contradict the Boy Scout Oath will result in many young boys being influenced not only to tolerate but to accept and participate in LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) sexual activities.This will put their lives in danger.

 

 As these LGBT boys turn 18, they will demand to become Boy Scout leaders; and there will be no foothold to which the BSA can cling on that slippery slope.

 

 INADEQUATE  EFFORT ON OUR PART

 

 Perhaps we who truly care about the health and well-being of other people have not done a good job of communicating our message. We must not have made it clear that because we care, we want people to live a healthy and long life.  This will not happen to those who practice the sexual activities involved with the LGBT lifestyle.   

 

 The medical data is “an equal opportunity provider.”  Most of the medical data is not subject to the usual bias based upon race, ethnicity, or gender.  Sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s, STI’s) do not really care who a person is nor to what organization, group, political party, race, ethnicity, or gender the person belongs. 

 

 Bottom line:  For those people who insist on “playing with fire, they will get burned.”  STD’s will strike with equal vengeance, most of them based upon the dangerous sexual activities of the people involved.

 

 We who do care about the well-being of other people have allowed the LGBT community to portray and market themselves as being well-dressed, debonair, handsome, beautiful, “gay,” and happy.  What we should have done all along is to tell the truth about how truly dangerous and unhealthy LGBT sexual activities really are.

 

 The problem we have faced in presenting the facts about the LGBT lifestyle is that it is so perverse; we cannot present those facts openly without exposing children and/or polite society  to the awful realities.  Our inability to present the facts has allowed the LGBT community to “sell” their bogus image. The marketing gimmick of the happy, same-sex couple is just that – a marketing gimmick; and unfortunately, the Boy Scouts have just succumbed to this LGBT marketing gimmick.

 

 SO WHAT IS THE TRUTH?

 

 Why are sexually transmitted diseases (STD’s, STI’s) rampant in the LGBT community…because they are urinating on each other, playing with feces, having vaginal/oral/anal sex with all sorts of sex objects, and participating in many other perverse sexual activities.   

 

 Because of the LGBT’s anal and oral sexual activities, they are not “gay” at all.   Instead, they are constantly seeking sexual arousal, each time falling into more desperate practices.  This leads them to even more perverse activities that end up damaging their anal sphincters and giving them such diseases as genital herpes, meningitis, throat/prostate/testicular/colon cancers, anal papilloma, syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, HPV, and many others. Then, too, the negative, long-term results of transgender reversal sex operations and hormonal treatments are only beginning to manifest themselves in the medical literature:

 

 http://www.cdc.gov/msmhealth/STD.htm

http://journals.lww.com/jaids/Abstract/1998/09010/Determinants_of_Sexual_Risk_Taking_Among_Young.10.aspx

 

 http://stdpreventiontraining.jhmi.edu/docs/Kent%20C%20et%20al_PrevRectalUrethPharynCT-GCClinMSMSanFran_CID_20.pdf

 

 http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/aids/facts/helpful_resources/lgbt/gay_men_health_concerns.htm

 

 http://factsaboutyouth.com/posts/health-risks-of-the-homosexual-lifestyle/

 

 http://www.hawaii.edu/hivandaids/Regret_after_Sex_Reassignment_Surgery_in_a_Male-to-Female_Transsexual__A_Long-Term_Follow-Up.pdf

 

 HIGH INCIDENCE OF SEXUAL PARTNERS AMONG LGBT

 Among the LGBT community, there is a high incidence of hundreds of sexual partners per year, thus spreading STD’s among their partners in an ever-widening circle. 

 

 In their study of the sexual profiles of 2,583 older homosexuals published in the Journal of Sex Research, Paul Van de Ven et al. found that ‘the modal range for number of sexual partners ever [of homosexuals] was 101-500.’

 

 …In addition, 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent had between 501 and 1,000 partners. A further 10.2 percent to 15.7 percent reported having had more than one thousand lifetime sexual partners. http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02

 

 Psychologically most of those in the LGBT community are emotionally bankrupt because they feel inadequate and have problems with jealousy and being possessive of their various lovers. They are unsure about themselves in all sorts of personal relationships; they lack trust, self-worth, and dignity.  

 

 Of those involved in a ‘current relationship,’ only 15 percent describe their current relationship as having lasted twelve years or longer, with five percent lasting more than twenty years…typical gay city inhabitants spend most of their adult lives in ‘transactional’ relationships, or short-term commitments of less than six months. —  http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02

 

 

 NOTHING BUT THE COLD, HARD FACTS

 

FACT #1:  Those in the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) community like to say that homosexuals comprise 10% of the population, but recent studies show that homosexuals make up only 3% of the population; yet these 3% are committing 33% of the sex crimes against children.

 

FACT #2 –  The scientific, medical literature is clear that pedophilia is connected to homosexuality.  Obviously, by definition male homosexuals are sexually attracted to other males. A disproportionate number of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners. Response to BSA Membership Standards Study Findings” — published 4.30.13 –

http://www.familyresearchinst.org/2013/05/response-to-bsa-membership-standards-study-findings/

 

 

 FACT #3 — “From 2005-2008…Most (74%) diagnoses of HIV infection in adults and adolescents were in males. Among males diagnosed with HIV infection from 2005-2008, 70% were attributed to male-to-male sexual contact. The percentage of diagnosed HIV infections attributed to male-to-male sexual contact was even larger (85%) among males aged 13 to 24 years…” 5.15.12  http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/slides/msm/index.htm)

 

 

 FACT #4 — “Men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 63% of the estimated new HIV infections in 2010.”  http://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/

 

 

 

CARING PARENTS HAVE NO CHOICE BUT TO PULL THEIR BOYS FROM BOY SCOUTS

 

 Because caring parents do not want to see their children influenced by a perverse lifestyle, they will have to pull their boys from Boy Scouts.  Thankfully there are some good alternatives:  Royal Ambassadors, Royal Rangers, Christian Brigade, AWANA’s, Pioneer Clubs, etc.  However, before moving their boys to an alternative organization, all parents will need to make sure the alternative choice is standing strong for traditional values.  

 

 MORE RESOURCES

 

 Please read this article posted at either website link – whichever is easier for you to read:

 

 “Adults Must Protect Our Country’s Children” published on 10.3.12 by Donna Garner

http://www.teapartynation.com/profiles/blogs/adults-must-protect-our-country-s-children-by-donna-garner-10-3?xg_source=activity

OR

http://educationviews.org/adults-must-protect-our-countrys-children/

 

Donna Garner

 

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TRASH TEXTBOOKS?

Share Button

textbooks

Educators across the state of Texas are working feverishly on implementing a progressive learning style called Project Based Learning. Sound great doesn’t it? As a student I loved doing projects and getting my hands messy, buidling and making dioramas, etc. Unfortunately this is not what it is all about to the liberal progressive educator of our day.

They want to trash your students textbooks and build a learning practice built on Marxist Lev Vygotsky’s learning theory of “Social Constructivism”. Social Constructivism is based on students creating their own knowledge of things. There is no absolute value, right or wrong. You will hear educators today mention 21st Century Learning Skills and Critical Thinking. These are buzz words for everything is up for debate.

The following is a snap shot of a newsletter from written by, Texas Education Service Center 6’s Coordinator of School Improvement, Ingrid Lee.  In the article Ms. Lee’s  promotes the idea of shedding textbooks and worksheets and grow relationships with peers and teachers. Are educators now promoting schools as just some sort of social club? I would hope we would send out children to school to be taught and educated by qualified teachers. Unfortunately,  Teachers are being converted into being just some class room facilitator. Students are to work in groups for the majority of the time in “DISCOVERING THEIR KNOWLEDGE”  as well as critically thinking material through and discover if it is truth for them or not. SERIOUSLY?

NO TEXTBOOKS

 

 

Eli Crow from Tyler ISD wrote this attachement on Project Based Learning and stated the following “Many of the CSCOPE curriculum performance indicators can serve as potential PBL project ideas.” CSCOPE has appeared to be the foundation for a bigger progressive agenda of implementing Project Based Learning. CSCOPE is not officially gone and thankfully parents and taxpayers are waking up to what is going on in our school districts. The fact that the lessons are supposedly going to be removed doesn’t remove the control aspect of CSCOPE for teachers and the agenda of Project Based Learning.

 

pbl

Share Button
Read More
TOP

IRVING ISD: WASTEFUL SPENDING BY TEXAS SCHOOL DISTRICT

Share Button

To add to our ever-growing list of Texas school districts that are wasting taxpayers’ dollars, we now have the results of a Public Information Request (PIR) from Irving ISD.

system failure

IRVING ISD – TASA & TASB FY12 & FY13 PYMTS_pro

Notice that Irving ISD over the last two school years has paid TASA (Texas Association of School Administrators) $35,006 and TASB (Texas Association of School Boards) $870, 022.  Just think how many classroom teachers’ jobs could have been financed by that huge amount of money.  – Donna Garner

Irving ISD — TASA and TASB Amounts

(2.14.13)

Irving ISD — TASA Amount

School Year TASA Amount
2011/2012     $3,494
2012/2013   $31,512
  Total   $35,006

 

Irving ISD — TASB Amount

School Year TASB Amount
2011/2012    $21,982
2011/2012      $3,830
2011/2012  $386,108
2011/2012    $33,707
S/T  2011/2012  $445,627
2012/2013    $15,172
2012/2013    $18,000
2012/2013  $391,223
S/T 2012/2013  $424,395
Total  2011 – 2013  $870,022

 

===========================

http://educationviews.org/wasteful-spending-by-tex-school-districts-tasa-tasb/

2.12.13 — This information was gained through PIR’s filed by taxpayers in Katy ISD, Katy, Texas. This shows how much money this district is spending on TASA and TASB each year. Schools throughout Texas pay similar amounts to TASA/TASB.  [Through PIR’s, taxpayers in Montgomery ISD have found that so far during this 2012-13 school year, TASA has been paid $22,240.]

TASA and TASB have been responsible for pushing school district officials to support Type #2 CSCOPE and Type #2 Common Core Standards.

Texas Association of School Administrators (TASA) is headed to Los Angeles, to the national conference to hear Linda Darling-Hammond talk about Common Core Standards — http://www.tasanet.org/aasa-national-conference-on-education.

Katy Independent School District — TASA Expense

 Year TASA Expense
 2010     $11,831
 2011     $10,824
 2012       $2,310
  Total     $24,965

 

Katy Independent School District — TASB Expense

Year TASB Expense
  2010  $10,490
  2011  $48,689
  2012  $17,842
  Total  $77,021

 

TASA and its “joined-at-the-hip organization” TASB (Texas Association of School Boards) use our tax dollars to hire lobbyists to go to Austin to lobby us for higher school taxes. (School districts also use our tax dollars to pay for school board members’ TASB expenses.) In essence, we taxpayers are paying to lobby ourselves!

Why should TASA/TASB live off our tax dollars?  Classroom teachers have to pay for their  own teacher organization dues and conventions if they choose to participate.  If administrators and school board members want to join TASA/TASB, that should be entirely up to them; but the Texas Legislature needs to pass a bill during this legislative session that requires public school administrators and school boards to participate in TASA/TASB by using their own personal dollars and not by using our taxpayers’ dollars.

MORE INFORMATION ABOUT KATY ISD

Katy ISD Superintendent’s contract – July 1, 2010 through June 30, 2015:

http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1110058879461-6/Superintendent’s+Contract.pdf

$288,400.00 – annual salary

$15,600 – car expenses

$27,063.24 – out-of-state teacher retirement

$500,000.00 – term life insurance policy

$16,500.00 to $22,000.00 – annuity policy

The district pays additional amounts for hospital, dental, medical care for supe and dependents; professional dues/expenses/travel/hotels/meals/rental cars for such professional activities as TASA/TASB/ASCD, etc.

Donna Garner

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEXAS TEACHERS CELEBRATING

Share Button

Texas teachers celebrate end of CSCOPE, say it will lead to improved student learning

 

By Ben Velderman
EAGnews.org

AUSTIN, Texas – A number of Texans cheered yesterday when state Sen. Dan Patrick announced that CSCOPE will be sent to the ash heap of history at the end of August.

CSCOPE is a curriculum management system used by more than 800 Texas school districts that provides educators with pre-written lessons to use in the classroom. A number of those lessons came under fire from conservatives for promoting a left-wing, anti-American point of view.

While conservatives were understandably happy with Patrick’s announcement, it might have been Texas’ teachers who rejoiced the most.

DANCING TEACHER

KLTV.com reports that many teachers despised CSCOPE’s rigid, one-size-fits-all approach to education. After seven years of CSCOPE, those teachers are thrilled to be set free from the tyranny of the ready-made lesson plan.

Bill Martin, director of the Tyler Sylvan Learning Center, said the end of CSCOPE means teachers “get control back over their classroom again.”

“They get to use lesson plans that they feel are best suited for their class and their students in their class,” Martin told KLTV.com.

Martin added that he doesn’t know “a single teacher that likes CSCOPE. Not a single teacher.”

One Tyler ISD teacher, who spoke to KLTV.com on the condition of anonymity, said, “The end of CSCOPE means teachers will be able to teach English and other core subjects without watering them down. It means we can prep students for college. The need for college remedial courses will drop dramatically as CSCOPE lesson plans are removed.”

The end of pre-written CSCOPE lessons means teachers will have to spend a lot of time and effort to write their own. Judging from the comments of one teacher union official, not many of them seem to mind the prospect of extra work.

“We’ve got to meet the individual children’s needs so they can be successful and this (CSCOPE) curriculum just has not allowed that,” Jamie Womack, organizer of the Texas American Federation of Teachers in East Texas, told the news site.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Texas Drops “Anti-American” CSCOPE Lessons; Battle Continues

Share Button

Written by Alex Newman

The New American

 

A highly controversial school curriculum used in much of Texas known as “CSCOPE,” which came under relentless assault from activists and parents who said it was promoting “progressive” anti-American and anti-Christian propaganda, was dealt a major blow by policymakers this week. However, despite media reports and legislators heralding the death of the divisive educational program, major elements remain in place. Still, the news was lauded as a victory for common-sense education as the national battle over Obama-backed “Common Core” standards heats up.texas flag

The CSCOPE program was touted online by its developers as a “customizable, online curriculum management system” for Texas schools. Despite being used in more than two thirds of state school districts, the scheme largely flew under the radar — at least for a while — until a broad coalition of concerned parents, teachers, political activists, Tea Party groups, and others eventually cried foul.

The system surged into the national spotlight earlier this year when conservative media outlets began exposing the curriculum contents, which critics lambasted as everything from “Marxist” indoctrination to “pro-Islam” attacks on Christianity. Others complained that parents were not allowed to access the material due to “licensing” restrictions.

Produced by the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative (TESCCC), the lesson plans included, for example, an assignment to design a new communist flag based on symbols used by socialist regimes. A controversial handout for “social studies,” meanwhile, portrayed humanity as evolving upward from a purportedly selfish free-market economic system toward socialism. The final step was communism, where, supposedly, “all people work together for everyone.” Another lesson suggested the famous Boston Tea Party could be considered an act of terrorism.

Among the most controversial elements of the entire scandal were school materials that critics viewed as hostile toward Christianity. One lesson plan, for instance, introduced the Christian religion as a “cult,” even suggesting that the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ described in the Bible represented repackaged versions of Egyptian and Persian mythology — an absurd notion that has been debunked by countless scholars and theologians. Opponents also blasted what they said was a “pro-Islam” bias in the lesson plans.

After the state-wide outcry turned into a national scandal, Texas lawmakers, under heavy pressure from constituents, eventually got involved in the issue. On Monday, months after the furor first erupted, legislators and TESCCC board members announced during a press conference that CSCOPE was essentially dead. The entity responsible for producing the material, meanwhile, will no longer be producing lesson plans or curriculums. Policymakers seemed delighted to put the controversy behind them.

“I’m pleased that the CSCOPE Board has made the decision to get out of the lesson plan business,” said Republican State Senator Dan Patrick, the chairman of the Senate Education Committee who led much of the effort to stop the scheme. “This is a positive development for students, parents, teachers, and for the Regional Service Centers. I want to thank the members of the Senate Education Committee for their months of work on this issue. I also want to thank Attorney General Abbott and his staff in providing valuable assistance in our review of CSCOPE.”

Sen. Patrick of Houston noted that once the TESCCC board officially approves the measure later this week, he would notify the state Board of Education that they no longer needed to review the 1,600 CSCOPE lesson plans. “The CSCOPE era is over,” the senator continued. “However, what the last several months has proven is that the state will have to create a plan to monitor all online material in the future so that our schools and classroom remain completely transparent to parents and the legislature knows what is being taught in our classrooms across Texas.”

TESCCC Chair Anne Poplin and other board members thanked Sen. Patrick and his fellow lawmakers on the state House and Senate education committees, saying their leadership had been “invaluable” and that they look forward to having a “positive relationship” in the future. “We believe that this is the best decision moving forward, and allows us to continue to provide high-quality services to the more than 1,000 school districts and charter schools in Texas,” Poplin and another board member said in a statement.

While spokesmen for the entity responsible for CSCOPE originally defended the material, it appears that the support softened as critics’ outcry grew louder. More recently, officials across the state rushed to distance themselves from the program as well. Conservative activists, meanwhile, celebrated the latest developments, with some arguing that more work was needed to rein in out-of-control educational bureaucrats and prevent similar occurrences.

“Never underestimate the power of blogs and grassroots pressure from conservatives in Texas!” wrote longtime CSCOPE critic David Bellow, a Texas Republican Executive Committeeman who has been blasting the program for months in online articles. “We must not let our guard down though and the Texas Legislature needs to continue to take action to prevent bad curriculum and an online backdoor curriculum from being introduced into Texas schools with no oversight.”

Not everyone was celebrating, however. State Board of Education Vice Chairman Thomas Ratliff of Northeast Texas was among those expressing concerns. “I’m already getting emails from superintendents and teachers at my districts saying, ‘Now, what?’” Ratliff said in a statement. “There were 1,600 lessons in that thing. That’s not easily replaceable…. For some districts, they are a small, optional part. For other districts, it was a lifeline. It’s a sad day for small school districts and the state, and it’s all because of politics.”

As CSCOPE critics celebrated the small victory and its backers complained, some media reports and officials suggested that the death of the program might not have arrived yet. Indeed, even though the controversial lesson plans will be taken down, the federally funded “Regional Education Centers” will continue to operate, and “management portions” of CSCOPE will remain available to school districts, according to media reports.

Even SBOE Vice Chair Ratliff noted that the “heftier” elements of the scheme, which outline the K-12 government-mandated requirements and the timelines for learning them, remain intact. “So, yes, the rumors of their death have been exaggerated,” Ratliff was quoted as saying in the Longview News-Journal. “It is not CSCOPE that’s going away; it’s just that one component.” The element that has been banished: the controversial but optional lesson plans. Everything else essentially remains in place.

To prevent a similar situation — Texas children being taught anti-American or anti-Christian propaganda — lawmakers are working on a bill, Senate Bill 1406, to provide more oversight of CSCOPE. The bill passed a third reading in the state House, and opponents of the controversial lesson plans are urging activists to back the legislation. Because CSCOPE still exists and will continue to be offered at Texas schools, Republican state Rep. Steve Toth also said he planned to continue pushing the legislation.

The 20-member governing board in charge of CSCOPE, meanwhile, is asking lawmakers to pass House Bill 1675, which would keep the federally funded “Regional Education Centers” open until 2019. Even anti-CSCOPE lawmakers indicated that they did not see a problem with the program, local media outlets reported. Why Texas or any other state would need or want unconstitutional federal funding for its education programs remains unclear — especially considering the “strings” that are almost always attached.

As the education battle over CSCOPE was heating up in Texas, a much larger fight was brewing nationwide — the effort to stop the Obama administration-backed “Common Core” standards. The controversial effort, which has relied mostly on federal bribes and bullying, aims to track students and standardize education across America by getting state governments to adopt the widely criticized standards. Some 45 states — not including Texas — have already signed up for the plan, but over a dozen so far are considering withdrawal. Activists and experts say that battle is just getting started.
Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, politics, and more. He can be reached at anewman@thenewamerican.com.

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

TEXAS PRINCIPAL promotes EDUCATIONAL REVOLUTION

Share Button

REVOLUTIONARY EDUCATOR

TRA HALL

MUNDY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

 

Texas we have a MAJOR PROBLEM in our schools. The uncovering of the Marxist/Progressive Curriculum Cscope are not going down with out a fight. The educators behind the deception tried their best to keep their agenda hidden from the public.

Tra Hall, a principal in Mundy Independent School District has been hot on twitter in support of CSCOPE. He even advocated today that teacher hurry and download the lessons while they still can.

TREY HALL 2

 

Below is a copy of Mr Hall’s blog from 2012 when he wanted to rid his school of CSCOPE though it is quite apparent he isn’t for a traditional (Type 1) education.  Has he changed his mind on CSCOPE? Maybe it is the progressive ideology that he hopes to protect, being that he advocates an educational revolution in our schools.

trahallblog

Share Button
Read More