TOP

Magnolia ISD: Dr. Stephens Where is the TRUTH?

Share Button

 

lies

Texas school district, Magnolia ISD, has made national news within the last couple of weeks due to the violation of “parental rights“. Their “NEW” policy prohibited parents from walking their children home from school in the name of “safety'” (I assume they did not think parents would be concerned with their own child’s safety and needed help from the “STATE”).

Magnolia’s new Bear Branch Elementary Principal, Holly Ray, informed parents that there would be no walkers at the beginning of this school year. Since making the news after parents had been issued “trespass warnings” and threatened with arrest the Magnolia ISD administration is now denying there was ever a “no walker policy”. The district claims parents have always been free to walk their children home although we have found no notice stating this fact up until the district released this statement on April 6th. As expected, the district diverts blame for their actions onto the parents. Labeling them as being “verbally and physically” abusive and disrupting school procedures. This diversion technique is a common tactic utilized among Texas School Districts when portrayed in a negative light in the news.

The new walker policy was pulled out of thin air once this news story broke. Parents may now walk their children home twenty five minutes after school dismisses if the car rider line has made its way through the parking lot and possibly a longer if not.  (More of “I” am in control).  So where does the TRUTH lie?

holly ray

Principal, Holly Ray

 

Parent, Robert Zeck provided this statement and a copy of the schools “CAR RIDER RULES” that specifically states “Students will NOT be dismissed to people on foot”.  Notice the bold word “NOT” in this one rule. Seems Ms. Ray wanted to make her point quite clear there would not be walkers. So why all the confusion?

robert zeck 2

car rider rules

MISD released the following comment to Fox 26 April, 15th stating “We are happy for parents to walk their children home”. I would say we have some major contradictions here. Where in the world are the board members in all of this?

misd lies

 

Holly Ray became the new principal of Bear Branch Elementary  this year. Parents upset with the new policy have followed the district’s administrative channels in hopes of reaching an amicable agreement.  Unfortunately, Ray and MISD Superintendent, Todd Stephens dug their administrative heels in and would not budge. One father met with Ray during the fall to discuss revising the new policy. With no agreeable consensus he left Ray’s office voicing his opposition to the “no walker policy” and said he would be at the next school board meeting. The meeting with Ray was held at 9:00 am on Sept 4th. At 4:00 pm the same day a Constable placed a “TRESPASS WARNING” in the father’s mailbox with no explanation as to why it was issued. Upon visiting the constable’s office asking for any and all documents pertaining to the warning, he was told there was nothing. Yes, that is right NO POLICE REPORT.

I would have to surmise that Ms. Ray, as Bear Branch’s new principal, did not want the father to address the first school board meeting of the year voicing complaints directed at her school policies.

Magnolia ISD has since come out claiming the warrant that was issued in the fall was due to the father attempting to be “verbally and physically” abusive to a staff member at Bear Branch Elementary though there is no police report backing up such claims. Fox 26 asked the district the following regarding the superintendents statement.

Fox 26It is their understanding? WHAT? Do they not have any facts? Now not only has this father, a school volunteer, been portrayed as possibly “verbally and physically abusive”, the district is now claiming his behavior has been an on going problem although there is no report of it. Hmmm, interesting?

 

The district also claimed there was no police report. Well after filing a Public Information Request the Montgomery County Attorney’s office released the police report that doesn’t exist. See below. I would like to mention that the superintendent, Todd Stephens claims in his press releases that a father has continually been a “verbal and physical” danger. Though the police report has zilch information pertaining to this or why a trespass warning was issued.  Interesting. Again Magnolia ISD where is the truth?

POLICE REPORT

todd stephens

Superintendent, Todd Stephens was emailed by the parents asking once again to be allowed to walk their children home as well as having the “Trespass Warning” removed. His response below specifically states there will be no “bike rider or walkers” at Bear Branch. In regards to removing the “Criminal Trespass Warning”, the superintendent left that up to the Ms. Ray, the principal. WHAT? Let’s look at this objectively. We have a man that the district claims is, and has been, a “physical threat” to staff at Bear Branch Elementary prompting them to call Constable, David Hill’s office to invoke a criminal trespass warning. Now the school principal, Holly Ray is qualified to determine when this father is no longer a threat in order to remove the warning? You can’t make this stuff up.

We also have two moms that walked to the school and picked up their children at the close of the school day in March and returned home. Within the hour Ms. Ray calls for a constable from Constable David Hill’s office to serve them papers at their home, in front of their neighbors and children. The constable informs the moms that if they walk their children home again they could either be charged with a class B misdemeanor or arrested. SERIOUSLY?

 

MOMS ADDRESS SCHOOL BOARD

Asked by Fox News Reporter, Andrea Watkins if the district will apologize for the excessive force and intimidation tactics. The district now claims these moms  have been a continued disruption to the dismissal procedures. More blame shifting and intimidation on behalf of Magnolia ISD district.

 

Districts statement to Fox 26 questions.

 

The following paper was distributed to parents at the beginning of the year.  The policy states “If you need to come inside the building after school, please remain in the car rider line until you have picked up your child and then park in a designated spot and check in at the front office.” I can see no other reason for that policy except to show the parents of Bear Branch Elementary that she is the boss and will control the parents and children and how they behave at “her” campus. Why else would you want someone to wait in the rider line, pick up their child, park, and then enter the building rather than park and enter the building where their child already was, do your business and return to you car and leave?

 

car rider policy

 

Texas State Rep Cecil Bell is now caught in the fray after posting Magnolia ISD’s response to Fox News on his Facebook Page. From all appearances it appears that Rep. Bell supports the Magnolia ISD School District over the parents in this situation and has yet to speak to them (his constitutents) regarding the matter.

 

Cecil bell truth

 

 

I will end by asking Magnolia ISD where is the truth?

 

 

 

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL EXPOSES THE DANGERS OF COMMON CORE

Share Button

FRC

 

REGISTER HERE

 

 

Program guests include:

  • Host Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council
  • Co-Host Sarah Perry, Senior Fellow, Family Research Council
  • Gov. Bobby Jindal (R-La.)
  • Rep. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.)
  • Dr. Sandra Stotsky, Professor, University of Arkansas
  • Jane Robbins, Esq., American Principles Project
  • Dr. Neal McCluskey, CATO Institute
  • Will Estrada, Esq., Home School Legal Defense Association

Please don’t miss what our guests have to say about these educational standards and learn how you can reverse Common Core state-by-state.

We want to hear from you! Please send your questions to commoncore@frc.org, or Tweet them to @frcdc, using the hashtag #ccquestions. We’ll answer as many of your questions as possible during the webcast.

Share Button
Read More
TOP

COMMON CORE ARCHITECT DAVID COLEMAN’S NEXT DECEPTION: THE NEW AP U.S. HISTORY EXAM

Share Button

BRIGHT

“Common Core David Coleman’s Next Deception:  The New AP U. S. History Exam:

 

By Dr. Susan Berry

 

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/07/11/David-Coleman-s-Second-Deception-After-Common-Core-The-New-AP-U-S-History-Exam

Polls increasingly show that as more Americans learn about the Common Core standards, they don’t like what they see.

Hopefully, Americans will feel the same way as they learn more about how the new Advanced Placement (AP) U.S. History exam will decimate the teaching of traditional American history, turning it into a leftist view of an America that is based on identity politics rather than a Constitution meant to protect the rights of individual freedoms.

 

The new AP U.S. History exam has been authorized under David Coleman, known as the “architect” of the Common Core standards and, now, the president of the College Board, the organization responsible for the SAT college entrance exam and the various Advanced Placement exams.

 

Conservative commentator Stanley Kurtz, a contributing editor for National Review Online, wrote on Thursday about the secretive manner in which the AP U.S. History exam was rolled out as well as the significance of this new exam.

 

“We are witnessing a coordinated, two-pronged effort to effectively federalize all of American K-12 education, while shifting its content sharply to the left,” Kurtz states.

 

He explains that while the College Board under Coleman has put on a public display of a lengthy “framework” for the new AP U.S. History exam, that framework actually contains only a few sample questions.

 

“Sources tell me, however, that a complete sample exam has to be released, although only to certified AP U.S. History teachers,” Kurtz continues. “Those teachers have been warned, under penalty of law and the stripping of their AP teaching privileges, not to disclose the content of the new sample AP U.S. History exam to anyone.”

 

Perhaps Coleman’s method of operations with the AP U.S. History exam is more recognizable now since it is one and the same as the method used in stifling public access to the Common Core standards. With the latter, English and Language Arts expert Dr. Sandra Stotsky and mathematician Dr. James Milgram, who were both invited to be members of the Common Core Validation Committee — apparently for little more than to serve as “window dressing” — said they were sworn to secrecy not to reveal discussions at their meetings with the committee. Subsequently, their recommendations regarding the standards were then promptly ignored by Coleman and the other lead writers.

 

Public access to the Common Core standards was also curtailed through a liaison with the federal government in which states could be enticed into adopting the standards by dangling federal funding and the promise of relief from federal No Child Left Behind restrictions in front of their eyes.

 

Without much ado, 45 state boards of education, having been strengthened in power over local school boards through years of legislation as well as a useful relationship with the U.S. Department of Education, adopted the unproven, untested standards — sight unseen.

 

Coleman’s achievement of keeping Common Core from public and media scrutiny is extraordinary when considering that the standards were developed by three private organizations in Washington, D.C.: the National Governors Association (NGA), the Council for Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), and progressive education company Achieve Inc. All three organizations were privately funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and none of these groups are accountable to parents, teachers, students, or taxpayers.

 

In addition, there is no official information about who selected the individuals to write the Common Core standards. None of the writers of the math and English Language Arts standards have ever taught math, English, or reading at the K-12 level. In addition, the Standards Development Work Groups did not include any members who were high school English and mathematics teachers, English professors, scientists, engineers, parents, state legislators, early childhood educators, and state or local school board members.

 

With his attention now turned to the AP U.S. History exam, Coleman is simply repeating a method that worked well for him with Common Core.

 

“This is clearly an effort to silence public debate over these heavily politicized and illegitimately nationalized standards,” writes Kurtz. “If the complete sample test was available, the political nature of the new test would become evident. Public scrutiny of the sample test would also expose potential conflicts between the new exam and existing state standards.”

 

Another deception observed by Kurtz is the College Board’s claim that the highly controlled new framework for AP U.S. History can be adapted according to the preferences of individual states, school districts, and teachers.

 

Once again, the parallel here is the now predictable pro-Common Core talking point that “the standards are not curriculum.” Supporters of the controversial standards claim teachers and local school districts can choose whichever curriculum they desire to comply with the standards. Of course, if they want their students to pass the Common Core-aligned tests, their best bet is to choose Common Core-aligned textbooks and lesson plans, which means content will be coming from those.

 

Regarding the AP U.S. History exam, Kurtz says that while it is true that the new AP framework allows teachers to include their own examples, the framework “also insists that the examples must be used to illustrate the themes and concepts behind the official College Board vision.”

 

Consequently, Kurtz observes:

 

The upshot is that James Madison, Thomas Jefferson, and the other founders are largely left out of the new test, unless they are presented as examples of conflict and identity by class, gender, race, ethnicity, etc. The Constitution can be studied as an example of the Colonists’ belief in the superiority of their own culture, for instance. But any teacher who presents a full unit on the principles of the American Constitution taught in the traditional way would be severely disadvantaging his students. So while allowing some minor flexibility on details, the new AP U.S. History framework effectively forces teachers to train their students in a leftist, blame-America-first reading of history, while omitting traditional treatments of our founding principles.

 

Fortunately, leading the charge against Coleman’s latest deception, the new AP U.S. History exam, is Texas, which comprises about 10 percent of the College Board’s market.

 

As Kurtz explains, Ken Mercer, a member of the Texas School Board, is attempting to introduce a resolution that would rebuke and reject the new AP U.S. History exam. Mercer is being told, however, that the resolution cannot be introduced until September, when it will be too late.

 

Considering that if Texas could reject the new AP History exam the entire project could be cast into limbo, Ken Mercer needs to introduce his resolution.

 

Kurtz urges Texans to demand that Mercer’s resolution be introduced and passed as soon as possible. Meanwhile, the other 49 states should demand similar action.

 

“The public should also insist that the College Board release its heretofore secret sample AP U.S. History test for public scrutiny and debate,” Kurtz adds. “There is no excuse for withholding this test from the public.”

 

“The controversy over the AP U.S. History Test is going to transform the national battle over Common Core,” Kurtz told Breitbart News. “The changes to the AP U.S. History Exam, enforced by none other than David Coleman, architect of the Common Core, confirm widespread fears that the Common Core will lead to politicized indoctrination.”

 

“Up to now, Coleman and his allies have done their best to avoid overtly ideological moves,” he continued. “Now they’ve tipped their hand. The AP controversy is going to energize the anti-Common Core forces and push this battle to a whole new level.”

 

“The AP controversy will also make it vastly harder for anyone to claim that Common Core is a conservative reform,” Kurtz added. “Battle lines will soon harden and the controversy over K-12 education in America is about to take off.”

 

According to Education Views, Texans are alerted to contact the Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott’s office and urge him to stop the AP U.S. History exam from being implemented this fall. More information can be found here.

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

Common Core Exposed in Texas @ CAN I SEE CONFERENCE, JUNE

Share Button

common core exposed

 

Please join us and register for this wonderful educational conference exposing the transformation taking place across the state of Texas in every school district. Not only are Texas Schools using and implementing the Common Core philosophy they are Data Mining your children without your knowledge. The CAN I SEE Conference is being held in Austin June 20-21.

“EVERY GENERATION HAS A DEFINING ISSUE AND NO ISSUE MORE DEFINES A GENERATION THAN HOW IT EDUCATES ITS CHILDREN.”

– Merrill Hope, Breitbart News

The PTA (Parent Teacher Association) will hold its annual national convention in Austin June 19th-22nd. Their keynote speaker is Arne Duncan, U. S. Sect. of Education, who, in conjunction with the national PTA, are cheerleaders for the Common Core.

In response to that event, we have a tremendous opportunity to hold the #CANiSEE™© the Solution counter-event on June 20-21, 2014. The Solution conference will feature some of the most prominent voices who have come together to end the federal takeover of K-12 public education.

THE SPEAKERS…

read.here.now.02

Dr. Sandra StotskyProfessor Emerita, U of Arkansas

read.here.now.05

Dr. James Milgram Professor Emeritus, Stanford U.

read.here.now.03

Jane RobbinsAmerican Principles Project

read.here.now.04

Dr. Peg LuksikFounded on Truth 

Phyllis Schlafly – Eagle Forum 

ALSO…

Dr. Duke PestaFreedom Project Education

Dr. Terrence Moore – Author of The Story Killers: A Common Sense Case Against the Common Core

Dr. Chris Tienken– Author of The School Reform Landscape: Fraud, Myth, and Lies

THE WORKSHOPS…

Jenni WhiteRestoring Oklahoma Public Education (ROPE)

Anita MoncriefTrue the Vote

Nakonia Hayes“The Story of John Saxon”

Glyn Wright – Eagle Forum 

MerryLynn GerstenschlagerTexas Eagle Forum

Mary BowenTexas Teacher and Education Advisor

Dr. Stan Hartzler- Classroom Applications of Cognitive Psychology   

Henry W. BurkeEducationViews.org Contributor

Lisa BensonLisa Benson Radio for National Security Matters 

Karen Schroeder Advocates for Academic Freedom

Jeanine MacGregor – Writer, researcher, cognitive learning expert

 

Share Button
Read More
TOP

The Perfect Plan To Destroy America – Nationalize Education

Share Button

reading_bible1

 

by Donna Garner 8.7.13

If a person wanted to destroy our American culture, keep this generation from communicating effectively with older generations, and make sure today’s children grow up detesting America instead of valuing our nation’s American exceptionalism, the best plan would be to implement the Common Core Standards (CCS) into every school in America.

OBAMA’S PLAN

That is exactly what Obama and his administration are trying to do, and 45 states (plus D. C.) originally committed to the CCS (before the standards had even been released publicly).  However, because of a groundswell of negative responses from the grassroots, a large number of states are now rethinking their commitment to the CCS.

TEACHERS REQUIRED TO DO…

As directed by the CCS, teachers have to make sure that by the time students graduate in 2014, 70% percent of books studied must be nonfiction (i.e., informational text); and those nonfiction selections must be taught in a “close reading” process.  That means students must not be given any background information or historical significance of a nonfiction piece before reading it.  For instance, the Declaration of Independence must be presented devoid of what was occurring in the United States at the time this monumental document was written, leaving students with a shallow understanding of the courage and revolutionary spirit that moved the signers to voice their opposition to tyranny.

Just as importantly, how many English teachers could possibly cover the great classic pieces of fiction literature in only 30% of classroom time?  None.  For instance, it takes at least four to six weeks in English I to cover Great Expectations, which is one of the most outstanding, applicable, and character-building books for early-high school teens to read.


THE DESTRUCTION OF FICTIONAL CLASSICS

As Dr. Sandra Stotsky recently explained about the CCS:

The reading standards for ELA are divided into 10 informational [nonfiction] standards and 9 literature [fiction] standards. That division goes from K to 12. It affects high school English as well as middle school English.  It means that over 50% of the reading instruction must be devoted to informational reading and less than 50% to poetry, drama, and fiction.http://whatiscommoncore.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/dr-stotsky-sets-th…

Dr. Stotsky as quoted on the Heritage Foundation website:

This misplaced stress on informational texts (no matter how much is literary nonfiction) reflects the limited expertise of Common Core’s architects and sponsoring organizations in curriculum and in teachers’ training. This division of reading standards was clearly not developed or approved by English teachers and humanities scholars…

Common Core’s damage to the English curriculum is already taking shape. Anecdotal reports from high school English teachers indicate that the amount of informational or nonfiction reading they are being told to do in their classroom is 50 percent or more of their reading instructional time—and that they will have time only for excerpts from novels, plays, or epic poems if they want students to read more than very short stories and poems (12.11.12 –http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2012/12/questionable-quali… )

ARE THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS GOOD STANDARDS?

Even more basic, do the Common Core Standards teach children to read well at all?  No, the CCS do not.

In K-3, explicit and systematic instruction of decoding skills (phonics) is lacking; and goals for the independent mastery of these skills are not set nor expected.  In fact, not one of the CCS objectives on phonics and word analysis skills requires students to apply their decoding skills by reading independently and accurately unfamiliar words in and out of context. 

Nonfiction/informational text is weighted heavily at all grade levels K-12 while fiction is given short shrift.  Teachers and test makers are given no substantive standards as to how to select nonfiction/informational text and, thus, are not held accountable to select literary pieces of quality and significance.  In K-12, there are only two standards (Grades 11 and 12) that even mention American literature.

“Reading to understand” and “use information” are commonly used phrases K-12 in CCS; yet teachers are not required to teach students basic concepts such as topic sentences, paragraph development, introduction/conclusion of expository text, and chronological order.  Neither do the CCS contain a clear sequence of informational reading skills from grade level to grade level.

Rather than having students use appropriate dictionaries, the Common Core Standards expect students to learn vocabulary words in context (e.g., CCS.ELA-Literacy.L.7.5a – “interpret figures of speech…literary, Biblical, or mythological allusion”).  However, if students have not read the great literary, Biblical, or mythological pieces of the world, how can they possibly understand the vocabulary words in context?

In the area of composition (i.e., writing), the CCS do not teach elementary students to write persuasive papers (called “argument”) that are built upon informed sources but instead encourage students merely to share their opinions.

The oral and written language conventions (grammar/usage) in K-12 have no logical, cognitive progression from grade level to grade level but instead throw in confusing, stilted terminology at random such as Grade 4:  “Use modal auxiliaries to convey various conditions.”  What fourth grader (and probably his teacher) even knows what that means and much less how to produce it?

Many of the CCS standards are not measurable and contain artificially inflated wording and expectations such as “Analyze a particular point of view or cultural experience reflected in a work of literature from outside the United States, drawing on a wide reading of world literature.”  As Dr. Sandra Stotsky stated about this standard, “How much and what kind of reading of world literature must precede the reading of a specific work that is to be analyzed for the author’s point of view?”

The Common Core Standards do not increase in depth and complexity from one grade level to the next.  Many of the standards are simply paraphrased or repeated frequently.  Particularly in the elementary grades where a child’s basic knowledge and skill foundation is put into place, there are not clear goals set that require students to demonstrate independent learning without having to be prompted constantly by the teacher.

Lack of ease with sounding out words automatically destroys a student’s reading pleasure and causes him/her to avoid reading the great classic pieces of the world.  The more the student refuses to read, the “dumber” she/he becomes. While other class members get “smarter” by reading more and better books, the slow readers fall further behind. This is called the Matthew Principle in the world of reading skills.

DESTROYING STUDENTS’ BIBLICAL AND LITERARY KNOWLEDGE

Of course, stripping away the teaching of the great classics of the world is the point because many are built upon Biblical principles.  If the Obama administration can limit children’s reading skills and destroy their appreciation and understanding of the Judeo-Christian ethic upon which America is built, then these children as adults will be much more susceptible to endorsing Communism, Socialism, Marxism, Islamism, Atheism, or whatever belief system will best destroy America’s God-ordained  place in the world.

 

Excerpts from E. D. Hirsch, Jr. in The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy (2nd edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1993):

No one in the English-speaking world can be considered literate without a basic knowledge of the Bible… All educated speakers of American English need to understand what is meant when someone describes a contest as being between David and Goliath, or whether a person who has the ‘wisdom of Solomon’ is wise or foolish, or whether saying ‘My cup runneth over’ means the person feels fortunate or unfortunate.  Those who cannot understand such allusions cannot fully participate in literate English.

The Bible is also essential for understanding many of the moral and spiritual values of our culture, whatever our religious beliefs. The linguistic and cultural importance of the Bible is a fact that no one denies.

No person in the modern world can be considered educated without a basic knowledge of all the great religions of the world — Islam, Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Judaism, and Christianity.  But our knowledge of Judaism and Christianity needs to be more detailed than that of other great religions, if only because of the historical accident that has embedded the Bible in our thought and language.

Probably the strongest reason to teach the Bible as literature is that almost all of the literature which scholars consider worthy of study was written by people who knew the Bible.  The Bible’s language, importance in society, and teachings permeate the majority of English works that are extant today.  Shakespeare’s education revolved around Bible study.  Try to find one of his plays that does not contain Biblical allusions.  Charles Dickens’ novels are replete with redemption allusions (e.g., ‘I am the Resurrection and the Life’ from A TALE OF TWO CITIES).

 

How will students be able to understand the writings of religious persecution if they do not know what the Bible says and how it was being interpreted by the various groups? 

 How can students understand the prejudice faced by Isaac the Jew in IVANHOE if they do not have a knowledge of Old and New Testament? 

 Students without Biblical knowledge will wonder why Gwenevere should be condemned to be burned for committing adultery against her husband King Arthur. 

 What would be so important about finding the Holy Grail if students did not know the crucifixion story?

 How will students feel the torment of Daniel DeFoe and of John Bunyan, whose wife’s dowry was her Bible which she used to teach John how to read?  (the end of excerpts taken from E. D. Hirsch, Jr., “The Dictionary of Cultural Literacy”) 

 

LITERARY ALLUSIONS: STUDENTS MUST UNDERSTAND THEM TO UNDERSTAND THE AMERICAN CULTURE

Following are various literary allusions that saturate our American culture on a daily basis.  Unless students read and study these great pieces of literature that have connected each succeeding generation with one another, how will today’s students be able to stay connected with their historical past and be able to appreciate our American way of life?

  •  The Journey — The journey sends a hero in search of some truth or information necessary to restore fertility to the kingdom such as is found in THE CANTERBURY TALES.
  • The Fall — This archetype describes a descent from a higher to a lower state of being.  The experience involves a defilement and/or loss of innocence and bliss as is found in Adam and Eve and PARADISE LOST.
  • The Quest — This motif describes the search for someone or some talisman which, when found and brought back, will restore fertility to a wasted land, the desolation of which is mirrored by a leader’s illness and disability such as in Galahad searching for the Holy Grail in IDYLLS OF THE KING.
  • Battle between Good and Evil — This is the battle between two primal forces such as between Satan and God in PARADISE LOST.
  • Heaven vs. Hell — This is the belief by man that parts of the universe are not accessible to man such as are found in the diabolic forces in PARADISE LOST, THE DIVINE COMEDY.
  • Supernatural Intervention — God intervenes on the side of man as found in THE BIBLE.
  • Fire vs. Ice — Fire represents knowledge, light, life, rebirth while ice represents ignorance, darkness, sterility, and death such as is found in Dante’s INFERNO.
  • The Hero — The life of the protagonist is clearly divided into a series of well-marked adventures which strongly suggest a ritualistic pattern.  The hero’s mother is a virgin, the circumstances of his conception are unusual, and at birth some attempt is made to kill him. These archetypes are seen in such Biblical characters as Joseph, Moses, Elijah, and Jesus Christ.
  •  The Devil Figure — The evil incarnate character who offers worldly goods, fame, or knowledge to the protagonist in exchange for possession of his soul is found in the Bible and is called Satan.
  •  The Woman Figure (The Platonic Ideal ) –   This woman is a source of inspiration and a spiritual ideal (e.g., the Virgin Mary).

Many important themes, concepts, and symbols are based upon Biblical literature:

The Trinity

The Cross

Temptation/Sin

Forgiveness/Redemption

Obedience/Punishment

Creation

God as a Power

Angels/Devils

Heaven/Hell

Twelve (tribes, apostles)

Self-sacrifice

Good/Evil

Forbidden Knowledge

Courage in the face of great danger

Value of Suffering

Prejudice (racial, political, and religious) Human Nature Faith in Human Nature Triumph from Adversity Poetic Justice

The following is a partial list of the Biblical references with which students must be familiar in order to be considered well-educated:

 

  • BEOWULF  — Grendel born of Cain, “God must decide who will be given to death’s cold grip,” hell, battle between good and evil

 

  • MORTE D’ARTHUR –Trinity, Sunday, Jesus, Holy Cross

 

  • THE CANTERBURY TALES — Pardoner contrasted to corrupted church, Christ’s gospel, forgiveness of sins, Holy Sacrament, Fiend, common enemy, perdition, story of Adam, Herod, John the Baptist

 

  • SIR GAWAIN — confession, penance

 

  • EVERYMAN — morality play, “I hanged between two, it cannot be denied”; “Thorns hurt my head.”

 

  • MACBETH — Golgatha, cherubim, Fallen Angel, common enemy of man

 

  • HOLY SONNET 10 — Donne — entire poem

 

  • HOLY SONNET 14 — Donne — “Batter my heart, three-personed God”

 

  • ON MY FIRST SON  — Jonson — “Child of my right hand”

 

  • PARADISE LOST — Milton — Adam, Eve, Heavenly Muse, Sinai,  Beelzebub, Seraphim, Tarsus, Leviathan

 

  • WHEN I CONSIDER HOW MY LIGHT IS SPENT — Milton — Parable of Talents (Matt. 25:14-30)

 

  • THE PILGRIM’S PROGRESS –  Bunyan — Vanity Fair, Celestial City, Beelzebub, Legion, temptation of Christ, Promised Land,  I Corinthians 5:10, Prince of Peace

 

  • THOUGHTS IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY — Addison — “I consider the great day when we shall all of us be contemporaries and make our appearance together.”

 

  • THE RIME OF THE ANCIENT MARINER — Coleridge — forgiveness, penance, blessing, Wedding Guest, Bridegroom

 

  • JANE EYRE — Bronte — salvation; Helen Burns is a symbol of suffering, redemption (Christ-like figure); Mr. Rochester’s punishment, “valley of shadow of death,” remorse, repentance, reconcilement to his maker

 

  • CROSSING THE BAR — Tennyson — “I hope to see my Pilot face to face.”

 

  • PROSPICE — Browning — arch fear, fiend

 

  • RECESSIONAL — Kipling — Psalms 51:17, Romans 2:14

 

  • THE HOLLOW MEN — Eliot — “For thine is the kingdom”

 

  • THE ADVENTURES OF HUCKLEBERRY FINN — Twain –  King Solomon, “pray  in the closet”

 

  • THE SCARLET LETTER — Hawthorne — Divine Maternity

 

  • A TALE OF TWO CITIES — Dickens — “Recalled to life,” sacrifice, redemption, Carton as the Christ-like figure (John 11:25), blood, forgiveness, power of love

 

  • LE’ MORTE D’ARTHUR — Pentecost

 

  • MORTE D’ARTHUR — Tennyson — “The light that led the holy Elders with the gift of myrrh.”

 

  • MERLIN — Muir — “The furrow drawn by Adam’s finger” — Genesis 1-5

 

  • WATERSHIP DOWN — Adams — The Creation, Noah’s Ark

 

  • OLD MAN AND THE SEA — Hemingway — Santiago (Christ-like figure), the mast, three days at sea

 

  • THE DEVIL AND TOM WALKER — Irving — Old Scratch, the Devil

 

  • THE GRAPES OF WRATH — Rose of Sharon, Exodus from Oklahoma, Noah’s Ark

 

  • THE SECOND COMING — Yeats — birth of Christ, Bethlehem

 

  • THE PEARL — Steinbeck — Hail Mary, tithe

 

  • HUSWIFERY — Taylor — God’s grace

 

  • THE FIRST SEVEN YEARS — Malamud — allusion to Genesis 29

 

  • THE BURNING OF OUR HOUSE — Bradstreet — Job 1:21, Ecclesiastes 1:2

 

  • SINNERS IN THE HANDS OF AN ANGRY GOD — Jonathan Edwards

 

  • THE MASQUE OF RED DEATH — Poe — “out-Heroded Herod,” a thief in the night

 

  • TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD — Lee –”take this cup from you,”  the parable of the good Samaritan, “Who is your neighbor?”

 

The following Spanish literature is taught as a part of the Advanced Placement curriculum and is filled with Biblical allusions:

 

· LA CELESTINA –Fernando de Rojas

 

· El CANTOR DE MÍO — epic poem of Spain

 

· DON QUIJOTE DE LA MANCHA — Miguel de Cervantes

 

· LAZARILLO DE TORMES — author unknown

 

· APOCALIPSIS –Marco Denevi

 

· EL EVANGELIO SEGÚN MARCOS — Jorge Luis Borges

 

· LOS DOS REYES Y LOS DOS LABERINTOS –  Jorge Luis Borges

 

· SONETO A CRISTO CRUCIFICADO — anonymous

 

· UNA CARTA A DIÓS — Gregorio Lopez y Fuentes

 

· LA LEYENDA DE SANTO DOMINGO DE LA CALZADA

 

· GENESIS — Marco Denevi

 

· SAN MANUEL BUENO, MÁRTIR — Miguel de Unamuno

CONCLUSION

Reading with ease and comprehension forms the cornerstone upon which success in all other school courses is based.  Reading the literary classics takes time but opens doors of opportunity and understanding for students.  The study of the Bible as literature is fundamental to a student’s education.  Biblical allusions exist in the classics as well as in modern literature.  Including the study of the Bible gives students a broader understanding of the major works that they will read in school and later in life.

Because the Common Core Standards diminish time spent on the great classic pieces of the world, many of which were written by authors “who cut their teeth” on the Bible, students who largely study informational text through the “close method” will lack an understanding of American exceptionalism.  We as Americans must not allow this to happen to our children and grandchildren who are the future of this great nation.

Share Button
Read More